FDTTX vs. FALGX
FDTTX (Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A) and FALGX (Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FDTTX returned 16.04%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for FALGX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDTTX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for FALGX.
Performance
FDTTX vs. FALGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, FDTTX has outperformed FALGX with an annualized return of 16.04%, while FALGX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.17% annualized return.
FDTTX
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- 1Y
- 28.25%
- 3Y*
- 25.34%
- 5Y*
- 16.12%
- 10Y*
- 16.04%
FALGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 10.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
FDTTX vs. FALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTTX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A | 9.09% | 27.28% | 26.68% | 23.86% | -8.28% | 24.97% | 8.84% | 30.98% | -9.36% | 16.36% |
FALGX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M | 0.00% | 19.09% | 18.68% | 22.88% | -8.40% | 25.20% | 8.27% | 31.01% | -8.88% | 16.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTTX and FALGX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 1996 | 0.89 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDTTX and FALGX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDTTX vs. FALGX — Risk / Return Rank
FDTTX
FALGX
FDTTX vs. FALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDTTX | FALGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.46 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 2.54 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | 4.12 | +9.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDTTX vs. FALGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTTX drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, smaller than the maximum FALGX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTTX and FALGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTTX | FALGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.00% | -64.07% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.65% | -5.06% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.03% | -21.78% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -21.78% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.62% | -37.58% | +0.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -4.20% | +3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.13% | -14.41% | +3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 2.92% | -0.78% |
Volatility
FDTTX vs. FALGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FDTTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDTTX | FALGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 0.00% | +4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 3.52% | +6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.93% | 7.81% | +5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 16.62% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 18.66% | +0.21% |
FDTTX vs. FALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDTTX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FALGX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDTTX vs. FALGX - Dividend Comparison
FDTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, more than FALGX's 5.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FALGX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M | 5.76% | 5.76% | 0.00% | 3.20% | 1.91% | 6.44% | 5.25% | 8.39% | 16.99% | 6.42% | 1.85% | 2.74% |
FDTTX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A | 9.87% | 10.77% | 9.20% | 4.34% | 5.64% | 5.60% | 4.40% | 7.49% | 16.04% | 5.52% | 2.74% | 5.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDTTX and FALGX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDTTX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to FALGX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTTX dropped -58.00% vs FALGX's -64.07%.
FDTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDTTX and FALGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer