PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTS vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTS achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FDTS has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.96%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.50% annualized return.


FDTS

1D
-0.17%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
18.78%
6M
20.77%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
24.70%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
10.96%

VOO

1D
0.55%
1M
0.37%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.44%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
18.78%51.17%2.44%10.96%-15.34%11.79%12.90%18.71%-23.71%36.01%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.08%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTS and VOO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012

0.44

Over the past year, FDTS and VOO have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.

FDTS vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDTS
VOO

Industrials

22.2%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

18.9%
10.1%

Technology

14.1%
35.6%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.6%

Basic Materials

11.3%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.9%

Real Estate

4.3%
1.9%

Energy

4.0%
3.5%

Communication Services

3.2%
11.1%

Healthcare

2.8%
8.5%

Utilities

2.7%
2.8%

Industrials

FDTS
22.2%
VOO
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FDTS
18.9%
VOO
10.1%

Technology

FDTS
14.1%
VOO
35.6%

Financial Services

FDTS
11.9%
VOO
11.6%

Basic Materials

FDTS
11.3%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

FDTS
4.7%
VOO
4.9%

Real Estate

FDTS
4.3%
VOO
1.9%

Energy

FDTS
4.0%
VOO
3.5%

Communication Services

FDTS
3.2%
VOO
11.1%

Healthcare

FDTS
2.8%
VOO
8.5%

Utilities

FDTS
2.7%
VOO
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDTSVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

2.75

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.78

12.42

-0.64

FDTS vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTS Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTS and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDTS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTS drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTS and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTSVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.26%

-33.99%

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-8.90%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

-18.69%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.11%

-24.52%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

-33.99%

-17.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.77%

-2.34%

-2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-3.68%

-6.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

1.97%

+1.69%

Volatility

FDTS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.34%. This indicates that FDTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTSVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.44%

4.34%

+4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.54%

9.58%

+5.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.27%

12.27%

+6.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.42%

16.88%

+12.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.92%

18.03%

+6.89%

FDTS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDTS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FDTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.53%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDTS and VOO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDTS has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTS dropped -51.26% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.50% vs 10.96% for FDTS. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.50% return vs 10.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.

FDTS has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

FDTS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FDTS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDTS and 0.03% for VOO.

FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTS and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer