FDTRX vs. STK
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK).
FDTRX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 24, 2013. STK is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Nov 25, 2009.
Performance
FDTRX vs. STK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDTRX vs. STK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | -10.89% | 18.97% | 31.01% | 44.92% | -40.07% | 12.90% | 58.22% | 36.84% | 3.22% | 39.87% |
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 7.23% | 24.85% | 17.74% | 46.60% | -30.36% | 48.63% | 25.39% | 52.73% | -14.91% | 33.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDTRX achieves a -10.89% return, which is significantly lower than STK's 7.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FDTRX has underperformed STK with an annualized return of 16.37%, while STK has yielded a comparatively higher 19.36% annualized return.
FDTRX
- 1D
- 5.05%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- -10.89%
- 6M
- -11.59%
- 1Y
- 19.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 16.37%
STK
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- 7.23%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- 1Y
- 50.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.77%
- 5Y*
- 15.10%
- 10Y*
- 19.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDTRX vs. STK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDTRX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than STK's 1.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDTRX vs. STK — Risk / Return Rank
FDTRX
STK
FDTRX vs. STK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDTRX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 1.97 | -1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 2.70 | -1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.38 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 3.73 | -2.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | 13.76 | -11.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDTRX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.97 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.61 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.75 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.65 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTRX and STK is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FDTRX vs. STK - Dividend Comparison
FDTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.66%, more than STK's 6.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | 11.66% | 10.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 2.80% | 1.71% | 3.44% | 2.40% |
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 6.96% | 7.38% | 16.02% | 6.70% | 12.62% | 8.48% | 6.79% | 7.86% | 14.88% | 11.82% | 9.87% | 10.32% |
Drawdowns
FDTRX vs. STK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTRX drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, which is greater than STK's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTRX and STK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTRX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.10% | -41.74% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.39% | -13.59% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.10% | -36.27% | -11.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.10% | -41.74% | -6.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.37% | -4.93% | -11.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.22% | -7.47% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.25% | 3.69% | +2.56% |
Volatility
FDTRX vs. STK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) is 9.28%, while Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that FDTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDTRX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.28% | 10.03% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.81% | 18.08% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.47% | 25.75% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 24.85% | +1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 25.92% | -1.39% |