FDT vs. PIT
FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. FDT is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDT returned 27.84%/yr vs 21.53%/yr for PIT. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.
Performance
FDT vs. PIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 32.48% return.
FDT
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 23.23%
- 6M
- 24.33%
- 1Y
- 50.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
PIT
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -9.34%
- YTD
- 32.48%
- 6M
- 34.12%
- 1Y
- 45.92%
- 3Y*
- 21.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDT vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 23.23% | 52.21% | 6.97% | 15.03% | -0.55% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 32.48% | 21.63% | 6.77% | -4.54% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDT and PIT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDT and PIT has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDT vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank
FDT
PIT
FDT vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDT | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.40 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 4.66 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | 15.95 | -1.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDT vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and PIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDT | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.10% | -12.27% | -33.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -10.56% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.29% | -12.27% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -10.56% | +7.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -4.02% | -6.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 3.08% | +0.46% |
Volatility
FDT vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) at 4.99%. This indicates that FDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDT | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 4.99% | +3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.27% | 19.29% | -2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.59% | 21.58% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 17.50% | +0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 17.50% | +1.12% |
FDT vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDT vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison
FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than PIT's 6.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.89% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 6.73% | 8.92% | 3.59% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDT and PIT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDT has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to PIT (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDT dropped -46.10% vs PIT's -12.27%.
On 3-year performance, FDT leads with 27.84% vs 21.53% for PIT. On fees, PIT is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PIT has been the lower-risk option at 4.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FDT has performed better with a 27.84% return vs 21.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PIT is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.73%, compared with 2.89% for FDT.
FDT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDT and 0.55% for PIT.
FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDT and PIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer