PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDT vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDT vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 14.23% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 18.29% return. Over the past 10 years, FDT has underperformed LVHI with an annualized return of 9.69%, while LVHI has yielded a comparatively higher 11.87% annualized return.


FDT

1D
-0.76%
1M
-4.05%
6M
3.93%
YTD
14.23%
1Y
33.19%
3Y*
22.82%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
9.69%
ALL TIME*
6.57%

LVHI

1D
-0.70%
1M
4.07%
6M
13.36%
YTD
18.29%
1Y
36.20%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
16.77%
10Y*
11.87%
ALL TIME*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.56M$12.50M$12.04M
$37.17M$30.23M$26.64M

FDT vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
14.23%52.21%6.97%15.03%-19.51%11.43%4.29%16.82%-19.98%34.42%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
18.29%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FDT and LVHI is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016

0.62

The correlation between FDT and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDT vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDT
LVHI

Industrials

33.3%
13.3%

Technology

13.1%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
5.0%

Financial Services

10.0%
25.1%

Basic Materials

8.6%
6.3%

Energy

7.6%
14.0%

Real Estate

5.1%
2.2%

Utilities

4.7%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
10.4%

Communication Services

2.5%
6.1%

Healthcare

1.3%
7.2%

Industrials

FDT
33.3%
LVHI
13.3%

Technology

FDT
13.1%
LVHI
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FDT
11.1%
LVHI
5.0%

Financial Services

FDT
10.0%
LVHI
25.1%

Basic Materials

FDT
8.6%
LVHI
6.3%

Energy

FDT
7.6%
LVHI
14.0%

Real Estate

FDT
5.1%
LVHI
2.2%

Utilities

FDT
4.7%
LVHI
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

FDT
2.7%
LVHI
10.4%

Communication Services

FDT
2.5%
LVHI
6.1%

Healthcare

FDT
1.3%
LVHI
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDT vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDT vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDTLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.71

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

5.76

-3.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.32

24.05

-16.72

FDT vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDT Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDT and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDT vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.10%

-32.31%

-13.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-6.08%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-11.99%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.80%

-11.99%

-20.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.10%

-32.31%

-13.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.43%

-0.70%

-9.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-3.47%

-7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.52%

1.45%

+3.07%

Volatility

FDT vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.48%. This indicates that FDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

2.48%

+3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.77%

7.58%

+11.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.77%

9.46%

+11.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.67%

11.05%

+7.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

13.70%

+4.87%

FDT vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDT vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than LVHI's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.93%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.51%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDT and LVHI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDT has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to LVHI (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDT dropped -46.10% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 10-year performance, LVHI leads with 11.87% vs 9.69% for FDT. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 11.87% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 2.93% for FDT.

FDT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while LVHI is Dividend. FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDT and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDT and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer