FDT vs. FGM
FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) and FGM (First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FDT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while FGM is a Europe Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDT returned 11.17%/yr vs 8.76%/yr for FGM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.80% expense ratio.
Performance
FDT vs. FGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly higher than FGM's 3.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FDT has outperformed FGM with an annualized return of 11.17%, while FGM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.76% annualized return.
FDT
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 23.23%
- 6M
- 24.33%
- 1Y
- 50.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
FGM
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 18.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
FDT vs. FGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 23.23% | 52.21% | 6.97% | 15.03% | -19.51% | 11.43% | 4.29% | 16.82% | -19.98% | 34.42% |
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 3.19% | 63.60% | 1.36% | 13.28% | -30.46% | 6.10% | 17.26% | 20.77% | -25.14% | 44.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDT and FGM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2012 | 0.73 |
The correlation between FDT and FGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDT vs. FGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDT
FGM
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
FDT
FGM
Consumer Cyclical
FDT
FGM
Financial Services
FDT
FGM
Basic Materials
FDT
FGM
Energy
FDT
FGM
-
Technology
FDT
FGM
-
Real Estate
FDT
FGM
Utilities
FDT
FGM
Consumer Defensive
FDT
FGM
Communication Services
FDT
FGM
Healthcare
FDT
FGM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDT vs. FGM — Risk / Return Rank
FDT
FGM
FDT vs. FGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDT | FGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.16 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 0.98 | +2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | 3.01 | +11.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDT vs. FGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, smaller than the maximum FGM drawdown of -51.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and FGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDT | FGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.10% | -51.58% | +5.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -17.76% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.29% | -17.93% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.80% | -50.22% | +17.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.10% | -51.58% | +5.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -8.26% | +4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -14.72% | +3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 5.81% | -2.27% |
Volatility
FDT vs. FGM - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) at 6.75%. This indicates that FDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDT | FGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 6.75% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.27% | 17.55% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.59% | 20.94% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 24.54% | -6.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 23.11% | -4.49% |
FDT vs. FGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FDT and FGM have an expense ratio of 0.80%.
Dividends
FDT vs. FGM - Dividend Comparison
FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than FGM's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.89% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 0.64% | 0.66% | 2.56% | 2.82% | 5.44% | 1.43% | 1.33% | 2.30% | 2.18% | 2.11% | 1.33% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDT and FGM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDT has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to FGM (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDT dropped -46.10% vs FGM's -51.58%.
On 10-year performance, FDT leads with 11.17% vs 8.76% for FGM. Both ETFs have the same 0.80% expense ratio. On volatility, FGM has been the lower-risk option at 6.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDT has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 8.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDT and FGM have the same expense ratio: 0.80% per year.
FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.64% for FGM.
FDT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FGM is Europe Equities. FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index.
FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDT and FGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer