FDT vs. EPU
FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) and EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while EPU is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Peru Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDT returned 11.17%/yr vs 15.16%/yr for EPU. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EPU.
Performance
FDT vs. EPU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly higher than EPU's 21.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FDT has underperformed EPU with an annualized return of 11.17%, while EPU has yielded a comparatively higher 15.16% annualized return.
FDT
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 23.23%
- 6M
- 24.33%
- 1Y
- 50.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
EPU
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 21.02%
- 6M
- 26.87%
- 1Y
- 85.51%
- 3Y*
- 46.38%
- 5Y*
- 28.15%
- 10Y*
- 15.16%
FDT vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 23.23% | 52.21% | 6.97% | 15.03% | -19.51% | 11.43% | 4.29% | 16.82% | -19.98% | 34.42% |
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 21.02% | 86.87% | 21.73% | 25.34% | 2.05% | -11.81% | -4.31% | 7.30% | -12.17% | 29.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDT and EPU is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FDT and EPU shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDT vs. EPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDT
EPU
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
FDT
EPU
Consumer Cyclical
FDT
EPU
Financial Services
FDT
EPU
Basic Materials
FDT
EPU
Energy
FDT
EPU
-
Technology
FDT
EPU
-
Real Estate
FDT
EPU
Utilities
FDT
EPU
Consumer Defensive
FDT
EPU
Communication Services
FDT
EPU
Healthcare
FDT
EPU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDT vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank
FDT
EPU
FDT vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDT | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.43 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 4.07 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | 11.73 | +2.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDT vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, smaller than the maximum EPU drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and EPU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDT | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.10% | -60.62% | +14.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -20.85% | +7.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.29% | -20.85% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.80% | -35.59% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.10% | -50.97% | +4.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -6.69% | +3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -18.81% | +8.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 7.22% | -3.68% |
Volatility
FDT vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) is 8.93%, while iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a volatility of 13.52%. This indicates that FDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDT | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 13.52% | -4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.27% | 26.94% | -9.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.59% | 31.04% | -11.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 25.11% | -6.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 23.64% | -5.02% |
FDT vs. EPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EPU's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDT vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison
FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than EPU's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 1.35% | 1.63% | 5.78% | 4.17% | 5.56% | 3.13% | 1.91% | 2.67% | 1.53% | 3.30% | 0.85% | 1.90% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.89% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDT and EPU have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPU has higher volatility (13.52%) compared to FDT (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDT dropped -46.10% vs EPU's -60.62%.
On 10-year performance, EPU leads with 15.16% vs 11.17% for FDT. On fees, EPU is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FDT has been the lower-risk option at 8.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EPU has performed better with a 15.16% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPU is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 1.35% for EPU.
FDT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EPU is Mid Cap Blend Equities. FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDT and 0.59% for EPU.
EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDT and EPU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer