PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDT vs. EPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDT vs. EPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly higher than EPU's 21.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FDT has underperformed EPU with an annualized return of 11.17%, while EPU has yielded a comparatively higher 15.16% annualized return.


FDT

1D
0.21%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
23.23%
6M
24.33%
1Y
50.01%
3Y*
27.84%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
11.17%

EPU

1D
2.12%
1M
4.37%
YTD
21.02%
6M
26.87%
1Y
85.51%
3Y*
46.38%
5Y*
28.15%
10Y*
15.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDT vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
23.23%52.21%6.97%15.03%-19.51%11.43%4.29%16.82%-19.98%34.42%
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
21.02%86.87%21.73%25.34%2.05%-11.81%-4.31%7.30%-12.17%29.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FDT and EPU is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.59

The correlation between FDT and EPU shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDT vs. EPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDT
EPU

Industrials

34.0%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
4.1%

Financial Services

10.2%
28.8%

Basic Materials

9.6%
52.7%

Energy

9.2%

-

Technology

8.1%

-

Real Estate

5.3%
3.2%

Utilities

5.2%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.7%
1.6%

Healthcare

1.4%
1.2%

Industrials

FDT
34.0%
EPU
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FDT
11.5%
EPU
4.1%

Financial Services

FDT
10.2%
EPU
28.8%

Basic Materials

FDT
9.6%
EPU
52.7%

Energy

FDT
9.2%
EPU

-

Technology

FDT
8.1%
EPU

-

Real Estate

FDT
5.3%
EPU
3.2%

Utilities

FDT
5.2%
EPU
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

FDT
2.8%
EPU
3.0%

Communication Services

FDT
2.7%
EPU
1.6%

Healthcare

FDT
1.4%
EPU
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDT vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

EPU
EPU Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPU Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPU Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDT vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDTEPUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.43

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

4.07

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.01

11.73

+2.28

FDT vs. EPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDT Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the EPU Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDT and EPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDT vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, smaller than the maximum EPU drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and EPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTEPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.10%

-60.62%

+14.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-20.85%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-20.85%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.80%

-35.59%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.10%

-50.97%

+4.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-6.69%

+3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-18.81%

+8.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

7.22%

-3.68%

Volatility

FDT vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) is 8.93%, while iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a volatility of 13.52%. This indicates that FDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTEPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.93%

13.52%

-4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.27%

26.94%

-9.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.59%

31.04%

-11.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

25.11%

-6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

23.64%

-5.02%

FDT vs. EPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EPU's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDT vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison

FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than EPU's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
1.35%1.63%5.78%4.17%5.56%3.13%1.91%2.67%1.53%3.30%0.85%1.90%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.89%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDT and EPU have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPU has higher volatility (13.52%) compared to FDT (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDT dropped -46.10% vs EPU's -60.62%.

On 10-year performance, EPU leads with 15.16% vs 11.17% for FDT. On fees, EPU is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FDT has been the lower-risk option at 8.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPU has performed better with a 15.16% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPU is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 1.35% for EPU.

FDT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EPU is Mid Cap Blend Equities. FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDT and 0.59% for EPU.

EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDT and EPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer