PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRV vs. FBCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDRV vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDRV vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
0.68%24.32%-21.73%12.27%-44.23%7.00%
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
-8.61%18.60%39.05%57.98%-39.10%4.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRV achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's -8.61% return.


FDRV

1D
4.39%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
0.68%
6M
-6.42%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
-3.64%
5Y*
10Y*

FBCG

1D
4.81%
1M
-5.43%
YTD
-8.61%
6M
-6.56%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
25.41%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDRV vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FDRV vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRV
FDRV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FBCG
FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRV vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDRVFBCGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

0.97

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

1.54

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.22

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

1.65

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.84

5.92

-1.08

FDRV vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRV Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRV and FBCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDRVFBCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

0.97

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.28

0.67

-0.95

Correlation

The correlation between FDRV and FBCG is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FDRV vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

FDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than FBCG's 0.05% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
1.33%1.14%0.43%0.24%0.33%0.04%0.00%
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
0.05%0.05%0.12%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

FDRV vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRV drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, which is greater than FBCG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRV and FBCG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRVFBCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.89%

-43.56%

-20.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.04%

-15.17%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.29%

-11.09%

-33.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.62%

-11.79%

-30.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

4.23%

+1.37%

Volatility

FDRV vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) has a higher volatility of 10.74% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 8.22%. This indicates that FDRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDRVFBCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.74%

8.22%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.85%

14.74%

+4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.04%

26.28%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.18%

25.82%

+6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.18%

25.92%

+6.26%