FDRS vs. SPXM
FDRS (Founder-Led ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FDRS is passively managed, while SPXM is actively managed. FDRS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
FDRS vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDRS
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- 6M
- -2.91%
- YTD
- -4.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 8.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDRS vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDRS Founder-Led ETF | -4.25% | -1.34% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRS vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank
FDRS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPXM
FDRS vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDRS | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDRS vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRS drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRS and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRS | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -5.08% | -16.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.81% | -0.75% | -8.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.31% | -0.78% | -8.53% |
Volatility
FDRS vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRS | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.23% | 7.65% | +21.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.23% | 7.59% | +21.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.23% | 7.59% | +21.64% |
FDRS vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRS vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
FDRS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FDRS Founder-Led ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FDRS.
SPXM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for FDRS.
They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDRS and 0.47% for SPXM.
Find the right allocation for FDRS and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer