FDRS vs. SPTM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FDRS (Founder-Led ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FDRS tracks the Founder Led Index while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDRS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.

Performance

FDRS vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRS achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.57% return.

FDRS

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 10.17%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPTM

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 4.45%
• YTD: 11.57%
• 6M: 11.50%
• 1Y: 28.51%
• 3Y*: 22.16%
• 5Y*: 13.47%
• 10Y*: 15.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRS vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDRS Founder-Led ETF	1.52%	-1.10%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	11.57%	-0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRS and SPTM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

FDRS vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 74
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 74
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRS vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDRS	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.46	-0.42

Drawdowns

FDRS vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRS drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRS and SPTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDRS	SPTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.64%	-54.80%	+33.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.31%	-0.25%	-3.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.35%	-9.05%	-0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDRS	SPTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.36%	11.87%	+16.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.36%	16.86%	+11.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.36%	18.03%	+10.33%

FDRS vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDRS vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

FDRS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDRS Founder-Led ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.03%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDRS and SPTM in my portfolio?

FDRS and SPTM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDRS or SPTM?

On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDRS or SPTM?

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FDRS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDRS or SPTM?

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for FDRS.

What is the main difference between FDRS and SPTM?

FDRS tracks Founder Led Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDRS and 0.03% for SPTM.