FDRR vs. SCHX
FDRR (Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FDRR tracks the Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates while SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDRR returned 12.13%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDRR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
FDRR vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FDRR having a 7.87% return and SCHX slightly higher at 8.04%.
FDRR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 7.87%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 26.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 8.04%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
FDRR vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 7.87% | 21.70% | 20.24% | 13.66% | -9.73% | 26.06% | 8.23% | 26.86% | -3.60% | 19.29% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.04% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRR and SCHX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FDRR and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDRR vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDRR
SCHX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
FDRR
SCHX
Financial Services
FDRR
SCHX
Communication Services
FDRR
SCHX
Healthcare
FDRR
SCHX
Industrials
FDRR
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
FDRR
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
FDRR
SCHX
Energy
FDRR
SCHX
Real Estate
FDRR
SCHX
Utilities
FDRR
SCHX
Basic Materials
FDRR
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRR vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
FDRR
SCHX
FDRR vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDRR | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.33 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 2.57 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | 11.26 | +1.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDRR vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRR | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.52% | -34.33% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -9.02% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | -19.04% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -25.41% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -3.11% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -3.96% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 2.05% | +0.03% |
Volatility
FDRR vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) is 3.79%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that FDRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRR | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 4.89% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.68% | 9.94% | -1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.25% | 12.65% | -1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 17.23% | -2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 18.16% | -1.30% |
FDRR vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FDRR vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than SCHX's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 2.16% | 2.21% | 2.61% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 2.09% | 2.85% | 2.89% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 0.61% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRR and SCHX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to FDRR (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 12.44% vs 12.13% for FDRR. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FDRR has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 12.44% return vs 12.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FDRR.
FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 1.03% for SCHX.
FDRR tracks Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FDRR and 0.03% for SCHX.
FDRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDRR and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer