FDRR vs. NACP
FDRR (Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates) and NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FDRR tracks the Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates while NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDRR returned 12.34%/yr vs 16.17%/yr for NACP. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDRR charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NACP.
Performance
FDRR vs. NACP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.34% return.
FDRR
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 21.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- —
NACP
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 9.70%
- YTD
- 22.34%
- 6M
- 21.77%
- 1Y
- 44.81%
- 3Y*
- 27.24%
- 5Y*
- 16.17%
- 10Y*
- —
FDRR vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 10.01% | 21.70% | 20.24% | 13.66% | -9.73% | 26.06% | 8.23% | 26.86% | -6.55% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 22.34% | 21.38% | 23.93% | 29.69% | -23.05% | 27.62% | 26.00% | 30.74% | -8.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRR and NACP is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FDRR and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDRR vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDRR
NACP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
FDRR
NACP
Financial Services
FDRR
NACP
Communication Services
FDRR
NACP
Healthcare
FDRR
NACP
Consumer Cyclical
FDRR
NACP
Industrials
FDRR
NACP
Consumer Defensive
FDRR
NACP
Energy
FDRR
NACP
Real Estate
FDRR
NACP
Utilities
FDRR
NACP
Basic Materials
FDRR
NACP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRR vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank
FDRR
NACP
FDRR vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDRR | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.85 | 3.21 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.96 | 4.25 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.55 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 4.69 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.70 | 20.63 | -4.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDRR | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 3.21 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.93 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.93 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
FDRR vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and NACP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRR | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.52% | -30.96% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -9.65% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | -19.66% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -27.89% | +6.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | 0.00% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -5.75% | +1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.19% | -0.19% |
Volatility
FDRR vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) is 3.08%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that FDRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRR | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 4.47% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.31% | 11.14% | -2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 14.02% | -2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 17.47% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 18.70% | -1.82% |
FDRR vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRR vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison
FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than NACP's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 2.10% | 2.21% | 2.61% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 2.09% | 2.85% | 2.89% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 0.61% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 0.55% | 0.62% | 2.96% | 1.28% | 3.48% | 3.06% | 1.48% | 1.22% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRR and NACP have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NACP has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to FDRR (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs NACP's -30.96%.
On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 16.17% vs 12.34% for FDRR. On fees, FDRR is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDRR has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 16.17% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDRR is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.
FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.
FDRR tracks Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDRR and 0.49% for NACP.
NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDRR and NACP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer