PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRR vs. FIWFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRR vs. FIWFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than FIWFX's 4.87% return.


FDRR

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
7.87%
6M
7.46%
1Y
26.53%
3Y*
20.07%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*

FIWFX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.83%
YTD
4.87%
6M
4.76%
1Y
12.13%
3Y*
9.58%
5Y*
4.15%
10Y*
6.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRR vs. FIWFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDRR
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
7.87%21.70%20.24%13.66%-9.73%26.06%8.23%26.86%-3.60%19.29%
FIWFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.87%11.81%6.76%11.32%-14.44%6.84%11.61%16.47%-3.39%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRR and FIWFX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016

0.83

The correlation between FDRR and FIWFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRR vs. FIWFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRR
FDRR Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FDRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRR Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FIWFX
FIWFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FIWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRR vs. FIWFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDRRFIWFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

2.91

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.81

12.59

+0.22

FDRR vs. FIWFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the FIWFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRR and FIWFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDRR vs. FIWFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, which is greater than FIWFX's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and FIWFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRRFIWFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.52%

-19.50%

-17.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-4.31%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-6.72%

-11.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-19.50%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.08%

-0.44%

-2.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-3.28%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.00%

+1.08%

Volatility

FDRR vs. FIWFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) at 2.34%. This indicates that FDRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIWFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRRFIWFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

2.34%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

4.75%

+3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.25%

5.65%

+5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

7.35%

+7.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

7.52%

+9.34%

FDRR vs. FIWFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FIWFX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FDRR vs. FIWFX - Dividend Comparison

FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than FIWFX's 4.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDRR
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
2.16%2.21%2.61%2.93%2.75%2.09%2.85%2.89%3.20%2.89%0.61%0.00%
FIWFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.89%5.46%5.21%2.60%3.14%2.90%2.67%18.25%3.19%1.99%1.91%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRR and FIWFX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDRR has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to FIWFX (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs FIWFX's -19.50%.

FDRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRR and FIWFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer