PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIWFX vs. FFLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIWFX vs. FFLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIWFX achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly lower than FFLEX's 11.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FIWFX has underperformed FFLEX with an annualized return of 6.58%, while FFLEX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.


FIWFX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.83%
YTD
4.87%
6M
4.76%
1Y
12.13%
3Y*
9.58%
5Y*
4.15%
10Y*
6.58%

FFLEX

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.77%
YTD
11.89%
6M
11.32%
1Y
26.89%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIWFX vs. FFLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIWFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.87%11.81%6.76%11.32%-14.44%6.84%11.61%16.47%-3.39%12.67%
FFLEX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Institutional Premium Class
11.89%21.47%14.20%19.97%-18.19%15.98%16.46%26.17%-7.21%20.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWFX and FFLEX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.94

The correlation between FIWFX and FFLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIWFX vs. FFLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIWFX
FIWFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FIWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FFLEX
FFLEX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FFLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIWFX vs. FFLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIWFXFFLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.09

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

13.32

-0.73

FIWFX vs. FFLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the FFLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWFX and FFLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIWFX vs. FFLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWFX drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum FFLEX drawdown of -30.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWFX and FFLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWFXFFLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-30.71%

+11.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.31%

-9.07%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.72%

-14.68%

+7.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-26.17%

+6.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.50%

-30.71%

+11.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.66%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-4.65%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

2.10%

-1.10%

Volatility

FIWFX vs. FFLEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) is 2.34%, while Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFLEX) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that FIWFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWFXFFLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

5.07%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.75%

10.39%

-5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.65%

12.46%

-6.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.35%

14.53%

-7.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.52%

15.22%

-7.70%

FIWFX vs. FFLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FIWFX and FFLEX have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIWFX vs. FFLEX - Dividend Comparison

FIWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than FFLEX's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFLEX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Institutional Premium Class
1.72%1.98%1.98%1.94%2.03%1.95%1.85%6.75%2.36%2.16%2.44%1.82%
FIWFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.89%5.46%5.21%2.60%3.14%2.90%2.67%18.25%3.19%1.99%1.91%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FIWFX and FFLEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFLEX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to FIWFX (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWFX dropped -19.50% vs FFLEX's -30.71%.

FFLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIWFX and FFLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer