FDRR vs. ACEP
FDRR (Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates) and ACEP (ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FDRR is passively managed, while ACEP is actively managed. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FDRR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ACEP.
Performance
FDRR vs. ACEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 15.67% return, which is significantly lower than ACEP's 24.65% return.
FDRR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- 6M
- 12.92%
- YTD
- 15.67%
- 1Y
- 28.88%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.06%
ACEP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 15.44%
- YTD
- 24.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $36.53K | $36.84K | $48.24K | |
| $1.12M | $1.06M | $1.10M |
FDRR vs. ACEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 15.67% | 5.38% |
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF | 24.65% | 8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRR and ACEP is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.69 |
FDRR vs. ACEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDRR
ACEP
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Technology
FDRR
ACEP
Financial Services
FDRR
ACEP
Healthcare
FDRR
ACEP
Communication Services
FDRR
ACEP
Industrials
FDRR
ACEP
Consumer Cyclical
FDRR
ACEP
Consumer Defensive
FDRR
ACEP
Energy
FDRR
ACEP
Real Estate
FDRR
ACEP
Utilities
FDRR
ACEP
-
Basic Materials
FDRR
ACEP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRR vs. ACEP — Risk / Return Rank
FDRR
ACEP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDRR vs. ACEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDRR | ACEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDRR vs. ACEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, which is greater than ACEP's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and ACEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRR | ACEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.52% | -7.06% | -29.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.44% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -1.74% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | — | — |
Volatility
FDRR vs. ACEP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRR | ACEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42% | 16.86% | -5.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 16.86% | -1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 16.86% | -0.06% |
FDRR vs. ACEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ACEP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRR vs. ACEP - Dividend Comparison
FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than ACEP's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 2.02% | 2.21% | 2.61% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 2.09% | 2.85% | 2.89% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRR and ACEP have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDRR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDRR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACEP.
FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.11% for ACEP.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FDRR and 0.45% for ACEP.
Find the right allocation for FDRR and ACEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer