FDND vs. ASMH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH).

FDND and ASMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDND is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Mar 19, 2024. ASMH is a passively managed fund by Precidian Funds that tracks the performance of the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025.

Performance

FDND vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FDND vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF	-12.29%	20.53%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	25.77%	58.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDND achieves a -12.29% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 25.77% return.

FDND

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: -3.59%
• YTD: -12.29%
• 6M: -15.83%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASMH

• 1D: 4.15%
• 1M: -6.47%
• YTD: 25.77%
• 6M: 39.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDND vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDND has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

FDND

FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF

ASMH

ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF

Return for Risk

FDND vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDND

FDND Risk / Return Rank: 17
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDND vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDND	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.43	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.18	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.49	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDND	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	3.00	-2.74

Correlation

The correlation between FDND and ASMH is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FDND vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, more than ASMH's 1.29% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF	9.19%	8.11%	5.51%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.29%	0.19%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FDND vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDND drawdown since its inception was -24.12%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDND and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDND	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.12%	-15.89%	-8.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.99%	-11.21%	-6.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.37%	-4.43%	-0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDND	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.98%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.36%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.45%	36.81%	-13.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.67%	36.81%	-15.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.67%	36.81%	-15.14%