PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDN vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDN vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDN achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 16.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FDN has underperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 13.65%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 16.98% annualized return.


FDN

1D
2.93%
1M
5.92%
6M
7.93%
YTD
5.08%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
13.65%
ALL TIME*
13.94%

TDIV

1D
1.46%
1M
0.77%
6M
13.11%
YTD
16.55%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
26.19%
5Y*
16.16%
10Y*
16.98%
ALL TIME*
15.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$122.99M$91.40M$110.17M
$13.43M$13.15M$15.23M

FDN vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund
5.08%10.70%30.35%51.48%-45.54%6.55%52.55%19.25%6.17%37.64%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
16.55%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FDN and TDIV is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2012

0.73

The correlation between FDN and TDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDN vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDN
TDIV

Technology

45.2%
83.2%

Consumer Cyclical

25.5%

-

Communication Services

25.2%
15.0%

Financial Services

1.9%

-

Healthcare

1.1%

-

Industrials

1.0%
1.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FDN
45.2%
TDIV
83.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FDN
25.5%
TDIV

-

Communication Services

FDN
25.2%
TDIV
15.0%

Financial Services

FDN
1.9%
TDIV

-

Healthcare

FDN
1.1%
TDIV

-

Industrials

FDN
1.0%
TDIV
1.9%

Basic Materials

FDN

-

TDIV

-

Consumer Defensive

FDN

-

TDIV

-

Energy

FDN

-

TDIV

-

Real Estate

FDN

-

TDIV

-

Utilities

FDN

-

TDIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDN vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDN
FDN Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDN Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDN Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDN vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDNTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.23

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

1.69

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.77

4.62

-3.85

FDN vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDN Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDN and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDN vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.55%

-31.97%

-29.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.31%

-16.34%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-23.00%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.97%

-31.97%

-22.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.97%

-31.97%

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-12.34%

+9.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.79%

-4.92%

-6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.91%

5.95%

+2.96%

Volatility

FDN vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) at 5.85%. This indicates that FDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

5.85%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.34%

16.31%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.36%

20.69%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.46%

21.12%

+6.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.67%

21.00%

+4.67%

FDN vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDN vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.35%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDN and TDIV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDN has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to TDIV (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDN dropped -61.55% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 16.98% vs 13.65% for FDN. On fees, FDN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, TDIV has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 16.98% return vs 13.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.00% for FDN.

FDN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. FDN tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDN and 0.50% for TDIV.

TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDN and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer