FDN vs. SPIT
FDN (First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FDN is passively managed, while SPIT is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDN charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.
Performance
FDN vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDN achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 27.30% return.
FDN
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.45%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
SPIT
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 18.89%
- YTD
- 27.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDN vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index | 2.09% | -3.14% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 27.30% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDN and SPIT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDN vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank
FDN
SPIT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDN vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDN | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDN vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN and SPIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDN | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -12.49% | -49.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.16% | -5.43% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.80% | -2.51% | -9.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.73% | — | — |
Volatility
FDN vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDN | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.88% | 26.39% | -6.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 26.39% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.61% | 26.39% | -0.78% |
FDN vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDN has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDN vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison
FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.64% | 7.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDN and SPIT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDN is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDN is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 0.00% for FDN.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for FDN and 0.89% for SPIT.
Find the right allocation for FDN and SPIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer