FDMO vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
FDMO and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDMO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both FDMO and VT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FDMO or VT.
Correlation
The correlation between FDMO and VT is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FDMO vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FDMO:
0.69
VT:
0.64
FDMO:
1.07
VT:
0.96
FDMO:
1.15
VT:
1.14
FDMO:
0.73
VT:
0.65
FDMO:
2.52
VT:
2.83
FDMO:
6.33%
VT:
3.77%
FDMO:
23.84%
VT:
17.79%
FDMO:
-33.94%
VT:
-50.27%
FDMO:
-4.43%
VT:
-1.43%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 4.35% return.
FDMO
2.07%
14.27%
0.50%
16.30%
18.93%
16.08%
N/A
VT
4.35%
9.24%
2.86%
11.26%
12.82%
13.95%
9.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDMO vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FDMO vs. VT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FDMO
VT
FDMO vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FDMO vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than VT's 1.85% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.87% | 1.19% | 0.60% | 0.77% | 1.23% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.85% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.44% |
Drawdowns
FDMO vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
FDMO vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.67%. This indicates that FDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...