FDMO vs. VT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FDMO (Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDMO returned 14.22%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FDMO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

FDMO vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.40% return.

FDMO

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -1.50%
• 6M: 8.79%
• YTD: 11.50%
• 1Y: 22.87%
• 3Y*: 25.49%
• 5Y*: 14.22%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.38%

VT

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 0.92%
• 6M: 8.48%
• YTD: 12.40%
• 1Y: 24.89%
• 3Y*: 19.46%
• 5Y*: 10.72%
• 10Y*: 12.38%
• ALL TIME*: 8.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	$8.23M	$8.36M	$6.07M
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	$432.10M	$371.73M	$483.41M

FDMO vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	11.50%	21.43%	32.78%	24.79%	-19.32%	22.23%	21.71%	25.29%	-4.13%	23.93%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	12.40%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMO and VT is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016	0.89

The correlation between FDMO and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDMO vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDMO	VT
Technology	39.9%	31.2%
Financial Services	11.6%	15.7%
Healthcare	9.3%	8.3%
Industrials	9.3%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	9.0%
Communication Services	8.4%	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	4.5%
Energy	2.9%	3.6%
Utilities	2.1%	2.5%
Real Estate	2.0%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.9%	3.8%

Return for Risk

FDMO vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDMO

FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 49
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 77
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDMO vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDMO	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	1.80	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	2.50	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.32	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	2.58	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	10.76	-4.16

FDMO vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMO and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDMO vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDMO	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.94%	-50.27%	+16.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.22%	-9.67%	-2.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.88%	-16.51%	-5.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.44%	-26.38%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.32%	-0.73%	-4.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-6.97%	+1.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	2.32%	+1.16%

Volatility

FDMO vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 4.14%. This indicates that FDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDMO	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.48%	4.14%	+2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.86%	11.69%	+4.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.18%	13.96%	+5.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.46%	16.23%	+3.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.63%	17.19%	+2.44%

FDMO vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDMO vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than VT's 1.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	0.61%	0.61%	0.90%	0.87%	1.19%	0.60%	0.77%	1.23%	1.22%	1.09%	0.45%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.58%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDMO and VT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, FDMO and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FDMO or VT?

FDMO has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to VT (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which ETF is better, FDMO or VT?

On 5-year performance, FDMO leads with 14.22% vs 10.72% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDMO or VT?

Over the 5-year period, FDMO has performed better with a 14.22% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDMO or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDMO or VT?

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.61% for FDMO.

What is the main difference between FDMO and VT?

FDMO is categorized as Momentum, while VT is Global Equities. FDMO tracks Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDMO and 0.06% for VT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.