PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDMO vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDMO vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.


FDMO

1D
-2.80%
1M
2.15%
YTD
14.45%
6M
12.49%
1Y
31.10%
3Y*
27.66%
5Y*
15.71%
10Y*

UGA

1D
-1.12%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
64.09%
6M
60.42%
1Y
59.74%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
22.69%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMO vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
14.45%21.43%32.78%24.79%-19.32%22.23%21.71%25.29%-4.13%23.93%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
64.09%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-28.07%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMO and UGA is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016

0.16

The correlation between FDMO and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDMO vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMO
FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMO vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDMOUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

3.17

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.99

9.39

+0.59

FDMO vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMO and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDMO vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMOUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-86.59%

+52.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-18.96%

+6.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

-26.68%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-38.11%

+12.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-18.05%

+15.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-36.69%

+31.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

6.43%

-3.31%

Volatility

FDMO vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) is 7.76%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that FDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMOUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

9.24%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.60%

30.57%

-15.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.88%

35.22%

-17.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

34.45%

-15.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

37.22%

-17.63%

FDMO vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDMO vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
0.59%0.61%0.90%0.87%1.19%0.60%0.77%1.23%1.22%1.09%0.45%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDMO and UGA have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to FDMO (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 22.69% vs 15.71% for FDMO. On fees, FDMO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 22.69% return vs 15.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDMO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

FDMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

FDMO is categorized as Momentum, while UGA is Oil & Gas. FDMO tracks Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDMO and 0.75% for UGA.

FDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDMO and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer