FDMLX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDMLX (Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FDMLX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FDMLX returned 9.76%/yr vs 16.03%/yr for FSPGX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDMLX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

FDMLX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMLX achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 8.60% return.

FDMLX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 3.27%
• YTD: 10.07%
• 6M: 10.32%
• 1Y: 22.65%
• 3Y*: 16.72%
• 5Y*: 9.76%
• 10Y*: 12.55%

FSPGX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 7.10%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 6M: 7.98%
• 1Y: 27.43%
• 3Y*: 25.53%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMLX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDMLX Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund	10.07%	11.64%	10.76%	19.77%	-3.24%	27.54%	11.45%	17.72%	-7.17%	23.98%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	8.60%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMLX and FSPGX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.63

The correlation between FDMLX and FSPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FDMLX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMLX

FDMLX Risk / Return Rank: 39
FDMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FDMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FDMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FDMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FDMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMLX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDMLX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	1.85	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	2.50	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.32	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	1.76	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.64	5.90	+2.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDMLX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMLX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDMLX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.71	1.85	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.75	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.90	-0.14

Drawdowns

FDMLX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMLX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMLX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDMLX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.03%	-32.66%	-2.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.19%	-16.17%	+6.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.52%	-23.32%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.52%	-32.66%	+9.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.38%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	-6.37%	+1.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	4.81%	-1.99%

Volatility

FDMLX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 3.32%. This indicates that FDMLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDMLX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	3.32%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.75%	11.58%	-1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.29%	15.39%	-1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.88%	21.49%	+0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.21%	21.55%	-2.34%

FDMLX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMLX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FDMLX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FDMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.56%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDMLX Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund	10.56%	11.63%	12.75%	24.60%	65.08%	18.63%	4.18%	4.94%	9.28%	4.53%	1.51%	5.76%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.32%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDMLX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

FDMLX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDMLX or FSPGX?

FDMLX has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to FSPGX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMLX dropped -35.03% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.