PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDM vs. VXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDM vs. VXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDM achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than VXF's 14.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDM having a 11.66% annualized return and VXF not far ahead at 12.19%.


FDM

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
9.82%
6M
12.70%
1Y
32.32%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
11.66%

VXF

1D
1.09%
1M
5.51%
YTD
14.95%
6M
15.28%
1Y
32.08%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
12.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDM vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
9.82%18.64%13.00%12.76%-11.61%35.08%-4.04%27.45%-13.53%8.72%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
14.95%11.40%16.89%25.51%-26.52%12.31%32.45%27.96%-9.34%18.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FDM and VXF is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2005

0.86

The correlation between FDM and VXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDM vs. VXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDM
VXF

Financial Services

41.2%
14.6%

Industrials

16.4%
19.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.7%

Technology

6.2%
19.8%

Healthcare

6.2%
13.3%

Energy

5.0%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
2.7%

Basic Materials

4.2%
4.2%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.4%
6.0%

Utilities

1.0%
2.0%

Financial Services

FDM
41.2%
VXF
14.6%

Industrials

FDM
16.4%
VXF
19.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FDM
10.0%
VXF
9.7%

Technology

FDM
6.2%
VXF
19.8%

Healthcare

FDM
6.2%
VXF
13.3%

Energy

FDM
5.0%
VXF
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

FDM
4.7%
VXF
2.7%

Basic Materials

FDM
4.2%
VXF
4.2%

Communication Services

FDM
3.7%
VXF
3.3%

Real Estate

FDM
1.4%
VXF
6.0%

Utilities

FDM
1.0%
VXF
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDM vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDM
FDM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VXF
VXF Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXF Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDM vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDMVXFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

1.88

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

2.61

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

3.16

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.59

11.24

-0.65

FDM vs. VXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the VXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDM and VXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDMVXFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.88

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.31

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.55

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.46

-0.11

Drawdowns

FDM vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDM drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than VXF's maximum drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDM and VXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMVXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-58.03%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-10.21%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.47%

-26.92%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

-36.39%

+12.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.76%

-41.72%

-6.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

0.00%

-2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-9.56%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.87%

+0.18%

Volatility

FDM vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) is 4.22%, while Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that FDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMVXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

4.73%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

12.42%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.77%

17.18%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.37%

22.33%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

22.29%

+1.06%

FDM vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VXF's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDM vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison

FDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than VXF's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
1.25%1.43%1.56%1.81%1.80%1.08%1.68%1.37%1.26%0.97%1.13%1.45%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
1.01%1.14%1.09%1.27%1.15%1.13%1.07%1.30%1.66%1.25%1.43%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDM and VXF have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXF has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to FDM (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDM dropped -63.45% vs VXF's -58.03%.

On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 12.19% vs 11.66% for FDM. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FDM has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 12.19% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FDM.

FDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 1.01% for VXF.

FDM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VXF is Mid Cap Blend Equities. FDM tracks Dow Jones Select Microcap Index, while VXF tracks S&P Completion Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FDM and 0.05% for VXF.

VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDM and VXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer