FDLS vs. GRNJ
FDLS (Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF) and GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. FDLS is passively managed, while GRNJ is actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDLS charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRNJ.
Performance
FDLS vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDLS achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly lower than GRNJ's 26.11% return.
FDLS
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRNJ
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 8.92%
- YTD
- 26.11%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDLS vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | 13.12% | 4.76% |
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 26.11% | 5.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDLS and GRNJ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDLS vs. GRNJ — Risk / Return Rank
FDLS
GRNJ
FDLS vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDLS | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.96 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDLS | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 2.35 | -1.49 |
Drawdowns
FDLS vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLS drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, which is greater than GRNJ's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLS and GRNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDLS | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.32% | -17.32% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -1.17% | -1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -4.13% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | — | — |
Volatility
FDLS vs. GRNJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDLS | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.71% | 29.93% | -13.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 29.93% | -10.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 29.93% | -10.86% |
FDLS vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDLS vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison
FDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | 0.87% | 0.86% | 7.26% | 0.97% | 0.31% |
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDLS and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GRNJ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRNJ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FDLS.
FDLS has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.
They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for FDLS and 0.75% for GRNJ.
Find the right allocation for FDLS and GRNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer