FDLO vs. USMV
FDLO (Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF) and USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDLO is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index, while USMV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDLO returned 9.34%/yr vs 7.10%/yr for USMV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDLO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USMV.
Performance
FDLO vs. USMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 0.85% return.
FDLO
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 12.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- —
USMV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 4.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
FDLO vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | 2.30% | 11.77% | 16.06% | 16.38% | -10.38% | 24.00% | 12.19% | 31.10% | -0.26% | 20.44% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 0.85% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 5.64% | 27.69% | 1.33% | 18.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDLO and USMV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FDLO and USMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDLO vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDLO
USMV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FDLO
USMV
Financial Services
FDLO
USMV
Communication Services
FDLO
USMV
Consumer Cyclical
FDLO
USMV
Healthcare
FDLO
USMV
Industrials
FDLO
USMV
Consumer Defensive
FDLO
USMV
Energy
FDLO
USMV
Utilities
FDLO
USMV
Real Estate
FDLO
USMV
Basic Materials
FDLO
USMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDLO vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank
FDLO
USMV
FDLO vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDLO | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.09 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 0.67 | +1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.61 | 2.18 | +5.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDLO vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, roughly equal to the maximum USMV drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and USMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDLO | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.35% | -33.10% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -6.46% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.68% | -9.36% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | -17.93% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -2.91% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -2.87% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.97% | -0.28% |
Volatility
FDLO vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) have volatilities of 2.54% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDLO | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 2.62% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.64% | 6.13% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.89% | 8.61% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 12.36% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 14.52% | +0.96% |
FDLO vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDLO vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison
FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than USMV's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | 1.45% | 1.37% | 1.40% | 1.35% | 1.49% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.76% | 1.61% | 0.55% | 0.00% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.53% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDLO and USMV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USMV has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to FDLO (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLO dropped -34.35% vs USMV's -33.10%.
On 5-year performance, FDLO leads with 9.34% vs 7.10% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDLO has performed better with a 9.34% return vs 7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDLO.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.45% for FDLO.
FDLO is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while USMV is Large Cap Blend Equities. FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index, while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDLO and 0.15% for USMV.
FDLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDLO and USMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer