FDLO vs. SIXH
FDLO (Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF) and SIXH (6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. FDLO is passively managed, while SIXH is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDLO returned 9.29%/yr vs 9.59%/yr for SIXH. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDLO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SIXH.
Performance
FDLO vs. SIXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than SIXH's 10.69% return.
FDLO
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- 13.30%
- 3Y*
- 13.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- —
SIXH
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 14.63%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- —
FDLO vs. SIXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | 6.18% | 11.77% | 16.06% | 16.38% | -10.38% | 24.00% | 22.78% |
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 10.69% | 9.47% | 12.06% | 4.93% | 6.90% | 18.37% | 6.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDLO and SIXH is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020 | 0.54 |
The correlation between FDLO and SIXH shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDLO vs. SIXH — Risk / Return Rank
FDLO
SIXH
FDLO vs. SIXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDLO | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 3.22 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.60 | 8.17 | -0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDLO vs. SIXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, which is greater than SIXH's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and SIXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDLO | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.35% | -11.68% | -22.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -4.36% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.68% | -9.10% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | -11.68% | -7.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.17% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -1.83% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.72% | +0.03% |
Volatility
FDLO vs. SIXH - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) at 2.16%. This indicates that FDLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDLO | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 2.16% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.87% | 6.19% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.94% | 7.74% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.10% | 10.37% | +2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 10.10% | +5.36% |
FDLO vs. SIXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXH's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDLO vs. SIXH - Dividend Comparison
FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than SIXH's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | 1.40% | 1.37% | 1.40% | 1.35% | 1.49% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.76% | 1.61% | 0.55% |
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 1.86% | 2.23% | 1.55% | 2.04% | 2.06% | 1.65% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDLO and SIXH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDLO has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to SIXH (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLO dropped -34.35% vs SIXH's -11.68%.
On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 9.59% vs 9.29% for FDLO. On fees, FDLO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 9.59% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDLO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.
SIXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.40% for FDLO.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FDLO and 0.87% for SIXH.
SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDLO and SIXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer