FDLO vs. QLVE
FDLO (Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF) and QLVE (FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds - FDLO tracks the Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index while QLVE tracks the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDLO returned 10.20%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for QLVE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDLO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QLVE.
Performance
FDLO vs. QLVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly lower than QLVE's 16.77% return.
FDLO
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 5.38%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 15.69%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- —
QLVE
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- 16.77%
- 6M
- 18.50%
- 1Y
- 32.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.08%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- —
FDLO vs. QLVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | 5.38% | 11.77% | 16.06% | 16.38% | -10.38% | 24.00% | 12.19% | 6.50% |
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 16.77% | 21.87% | 10.17% | 8.53% | -13.10% | 0.90% | 4.16% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDLO and QLVE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.56 |
The correlation between FDLO and QLVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDLO vs. QLVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDLO
QLVE
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FDLO
QLVE
Financial Services
FDLO
QLVE
Communication Services
FDLO
QLVE
Consumer Cyclical
FDLO
QLVE
Healthcare
FDLO
QLVE
Industrials
FDLO
QLVE
Consumer Defensive
FDLO
QLVE
Energy
FDLO
QLVE
Utilities
FDLO
QLVE
Real Estate
FDLO
QLVE
Basic Materials
FDLO
QLVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDLO vs. QLVE — Risk / Return Rank
FDLO
QLVE
FDLO vs. QLVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDLO | QLVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.80 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.62 | 11.24 | -1.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDLO | QLVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.97 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.54 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.47 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
FDLO vs. QLVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, which is greater than QLVE's maximum drawdown of -29.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and QLVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDLO | QLVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.35% | -29.96% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -11.60% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.68% | -13.29% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | -23.94% | +4.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -2.37% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.38% | -8.29% | +4.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 2.89% | -1.26% |
Volatility
FDLO vs. QLVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) is 1.91%, while FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that FDLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDLO | QLVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 6.81% | -4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.42% | 14.87% | -8.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.75% | 16.51% | -7.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 13.48% | -0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 15.79% | -0.29% |
FDLO vs. QLVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QLVE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDLO vs. QLVE - Dividend Comparison
FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than QLVE's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | 1.36% | 1.37% | 1.40% | 1.35% | 1.49% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.76% | 1.61% | 0.55% |
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.44% | 3.14% | 3.11% | 3.00% | 2.48% | 2.57% | 1.66% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDLO and QLVE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLVE has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to FDLO (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLO dropped -34.35% vs QLVE's -29.96%.
On 5-year performance, FDLO leads with 10.20% vs 7.19% for QLVE. On fees, FDLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 1.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDLO has performed better with a 10.20% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QLVE.
QLVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.36% for FDLO.
FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index, while QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDLO and 0.40% for QLVE.
QLVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDLO and QLVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer