PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDLO vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDLO vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.95% return.


FDLO

1D
0.11%
1M
1.78%
YTD
5.91%
6M
5.34%
1Y
16.57%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.15%
1M
0.89%
YTD
61.95%
6M
59.31%
1Y
57.89%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLO vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
5.91%11.77%16.06%16.38%-10.38%24.00%12.19%31.10%-0.26%20.44%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
61.95%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLO and OILK is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016

0.14

The correlation between FDLO and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDLO vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDLO
OILK

Technology

33.1%

-

Financial Services

12.5%

-

Communication Services

10.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
100.0%

Healthcare

9.5%

-

Industrials

9.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Energy

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

FDLO
33.1%
OILK

-

Financial Services

FDLO
12.5%
OILK

-

Communication Services

FDLO
10.8%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

FDLO
10.2%
OILK
100.0%

Healthcare

FDLO
9.5%
OILK

-

Industrials

FDLO
9.1%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

FDLO
4.7%
OILK

-

Energy

FDLO
3.4%
OILK

-

Utilities

FDLO
2.3%
OILK

-

Real Estate

FDLO
2.3%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

FDLO
1.7%
OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDLO vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLO vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDLOOILKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

2.03

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.72

2.55

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

3.61

-1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.37

7.33

+3.04

FDLO vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLO and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDLOOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.03

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.59

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.11

+0.72

Drawdowns

FDLO vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLOOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.35%

-83.76%

+49.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-17.35%

+10.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-23.42%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-34.69%

+15.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-4.99%

+4.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-32.62%

+29.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

8.56%

-6.93%

Volatility

FDLO vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) is 1.72%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that FDLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLOOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

11.11%

-9.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.40%

23.24%

-16.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

28.86%

-20.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.06%

30.11%

-17.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

35.98%

-20.48%

FDLO vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDLO vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than OILK's 8.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.35%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.29%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDLO and OILK have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to FDLO (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLO dropped -34.35% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.52% vs 10.51% for FDLO. On fees, FDLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 1.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.52% return vs 10.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 1.35% for FDLO.

FDLO is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while OILK is Oil & Gas. FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDLO and 0.68% for OILK.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDLO and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer