FDLO vs. ACWV

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FDLO (Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDLO is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index, while ACWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDLO returned 9.84%/yr vs 5.30%/yr for ACWV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDLO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.

Performance

FDLO vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly higher than ACWV's 1.59% return.

FDLO

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 3.88%
• 6M: 3.86%
• 1Y: 13.32%
• 3Y*: 13.93%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: —

ACWV

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: 2.50%
• 1Y: 3.85%
• 3Y*: 9.71%
• 5Y*: 5.30%
• 10Y*: 7.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLO vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF	3.88%	11.77%	16.06%	16.38%	-10.38%	24.00%	12.19%	31.10%	-0.26%	20.44%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	1.59%	11.04%	11.38%	8.23%	-10.36%	13.97%	3.04%	21.04%	-1.42%	18.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLO and ACWV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016	0.86

The correlation between FDLO and ACWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDLO vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDLO	ACWV
Technology	33.8%	22.6%
Financial Services	12.1%	13.1%
Communication Services	10.8%	12.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	5.1%
Healthcare	9.7%	13.2%
Industrials	9.2%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	10.3%
Energy	3.2%	3.4%
Utilities	2.3%	7.8%
Real Estate	2.2%	0.8%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.8%

Return for Risk

FDLO vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLO

FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 48
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 17
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 16
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLO vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDLO	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	0.50	+1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	0.74	+1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.09	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	0.61	+1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.13	1.87	+6.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDLO vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLO and ACWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDLO	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	0.50	+1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.52	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.70	+0.12

Drawdowns

FDLO vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and ACWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDLO	ACWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.35%	-28.82%	-5.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	-6.37%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.68%	-7.56%	-6.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.23%	-18.14%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-3.64%	+1.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.38%	-3.11%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	2.06%	-0.42%

Volatility

FDLO vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) have volatilities of 2.17% and 2.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDLO	ACWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.17%	2.09%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.50%	5.66%	+0.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.80%	7.79%	+1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.07%	10.24%	+2.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.50%	12.31%	+3.19%

FDLO vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDLO vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than ACWV's 2.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	2.05%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF	1.38%	1.37%	1.40%	1.35%	1.49%	1.11%	1.38%	1.55%	1.76%	1.61%	0.55%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDLO and ACWV in my portfolio?

FDLO and ACWV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDLO or ACWV?

FDLO has higher volatility (2.17%) compared to ACWV (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLO dropped -34.35% vs ACWV's -28.82%.

Which ETF is better, FDLO or ACWV?

On 5-year performance, FDLO leads with 9.84% vs 5.30% for ACWV. On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDLO or ACWV?

Over the 5-year period, FDLO has performed better with a 9.84% return vs 5.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDLO or ACWV?

ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDLO or ACWV?

ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.38% for FDLO.

What is the main difference between FDLO and ACWV?

FDLO is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while ACWV is Large Cap Blend Equities. FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index, while ACWV tracks MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility (USD). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDLO and 0.20% for ACWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.