FDL vs. DIVO
FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. FDL is passively managed, while DIVO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDL returned 13.30%/yr vs 10.45%/yr for DIVO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDL charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
FDL vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDL achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than DIVO's 6.60% return.
FDL
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- YTD
- 14.12%
- 1Y
- 20.00%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 1Y
- 15.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- —
FDL vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 14.12% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 2.94% | 6.66% | 26.10% | -4.30% | 24.41% | -5.99% | 12.02% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.60% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDL and DIVO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2016 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FDL and DIVO shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDL vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDL
DIVO
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Energy
FDL
DIVO
Healthcare
FDL
DIVO
Financial Services
FDL
DIVO
Consumer Defensive
FDL
DIVO
Communication Services
FDL
DIVO
Utilities
FDL
DIVO
Consumer Cyclical
FDL
DIVO
Industrials
FDL
DIVO
Technology
FDL
DIVO
Basic Materials
FDL
DIVO
Real Estate
FDL
-
DIVO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDL vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
FDL
DIVO
FDL vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDL | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.70 | 2.60 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 9.17 | +1.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDL vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDL | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.93% | -30.04% | -35.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.27% | -5.95% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.24% | -12.12% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.46% | -13.72% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -0.58% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.62% | -2.59% | -7.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 1.68% | +0.20% |
Volatility
FDL vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.45%. This indicates that FDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDL | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 2.45% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.43% | 7.05% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.67% | 9.19% | +2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 11.93% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 14.79% | +2.33% |
FDL vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDL has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDL vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than DIVO's 6.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.41% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.72% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDL and DIVO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDL has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to DIVO (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 13.30% vs 10.45% for DIVO. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.41%, compared with 3.72% for FDL.
FDL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FDL and 0.56% for DIVO.
FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDL and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer