PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIV vs. ALTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIV vs. ALTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIV achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than ALTY's 6.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIV has underperformed ALTY with an annualized return of -2.13%, while ALTY has yielded a comparatively higher 6.16% annualized return.


FDIV

1D
-0.85%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.52%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
-12.10%
5Y*
-8.67%
10Y*
-2.13%

ALTY

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.31%
YTD
6.19%
6M
6.51%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
6.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIV vs. ALTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIV
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
0.72%2.95%-37.35%6.78%-9.97%10.20%-2.84%15.78%-5.04%6.19%
ALTY
Global X Alternative Income ETF
6.19%11.07%10.88%10.58%-11.92%23.08%-12.82%21.44%-6.18%10.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIV and ALTY is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.50

The correlation between FDIV and ALTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDIV vs. ALTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIV
ALTY

Industrials

24.9%
1.0%

Financial Services

20.0%
0.1%

Healthcare

16.2%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.0%
2.6%

Technology

8.9%
18.3%

Utilities

4.2%
12.7%

Basic Materials

4.0%
0.4%

Energy

3.0%
21.0%

Communication Services

3.0%
5.3%

Real Estate

-

33.2%

Industrials

FDIV
24.9%
ALTY
1.0%

Financial Services

FDIV
20.0%
ALTY
0.1%

Healthcare

FDIV
16.2%
ALTY
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FDIV
11.0%
ALTY
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

FDIV
9.0%
ALTY
2.6%

Technology

FDIV
8.9%
ALTY
18.3%

Utilities

FDIV
4.2%
ALTY
12.7%

Basic Materials

FDIV
4.0%
ALTY
0.4%

Energy

FDIV
3.0%
ALTY
21.0%

Communication Services

FDIV
3.0%
ALTY
5.3%

Real Estate

FDIV

-

ALTY
33.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIV vs. ALTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIV
FDIV Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTY
ALTY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ALTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIV vs. ALTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDIVALTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.54

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

3.64

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.56

16.84

-14.28

FDIV vs. ALTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the ALTY Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIV and ALTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDIVALTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

2.73

-2.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

0.53

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

0.37

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.33

-0.41

Drawdowns

FDIV vs. ALTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.90%, smaller than the maximum ALTY drawdown of -51.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIV and ALTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDIVALTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.90%

-51.47%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.01%

-4.34%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.64%

-10.08%

-35.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.90%

-18.48%

-29.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.90%

-51.47%

+3.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.05%

-0.37%

-37.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-6.75%

-4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

0.94%

+2.07%

Volatility

FDIV vs. ALTY - Volatility Comparison

MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY) at 1.41%. This indicates that FDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDIVALTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

1.41%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

4.38%

+4.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

5.79%

+6.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

10.61%

+10.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

16.58%

+0.96%

FDIV vs. ALTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIV vs. ALTY - Dividend Comparison

FDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than ALTY's 8.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALTY
Global X Alternative Income ETF
8.08%7.50%7.88%7.31%7.66%6.88%9.20%8.74%8.49%7.52%8.20%4.21%
FDIV
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
2.89%2.95%4.12%4.63%3.81%3.79%4.17%3.93%5.13%3.81%3.84%4.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIV and ALTY have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIV has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to ALTY (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIV dropped -47.90% vs ALTY's -51.47%.

On 10-year performance, ALTY leads with 6.16% vs -2.13% for FDIV. On fees, FDIV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ALTY has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ALTY has performed better with a 6.16% return vs -2.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ALTY.

ALTY has the higher dividend yield at 8.08%, compared with 2.89% for FDIV.

FDIV is categorized as Dividend, while ALTY is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: MarketDesk and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDIV and 0.50% for ALTY.

ALTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIV and ALTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer