FDIQ vs. XMMO
FDIQ (Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIQ is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDIQ returned 7.60%/yr vs 19.73%/yr for XMMO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
FDIQ vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIQ achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIQ has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 7.60%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.
FDIQ
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 10.28%
- 1Y
- 22.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 23.73%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
FDIQ vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 9.72% | 6.32% | 12.76% | -0.84% | -7.23% | 36.05% | -8.95% | 23.57% | -18.31% | 1.81% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 23.73% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIQ and XMMO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2011 | 0.56 |
The correlation between FDIQ and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIQ vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
FDIQ
XMMO
FDIQ vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIQ | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 4.45 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | 18.21 | -12.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIQ | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 1.99 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.78 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.89 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.58 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
FDIQ vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.86%, roughly equal to the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIQ and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIQ | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.86% | -55.37% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -8.34% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | -24.93% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.99% | -27.91% | -15.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.86% | -36.74% | -16.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.53% | 0.00% | -8.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.56% | -9.45% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 2.04% | +2.34% |
Volatility
FDIQ vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) is 4.06%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that FDIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIQ | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 7.82% | -3.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.93% | 15.54% | -1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.14% | 18.71% | +3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.70% | 21.45% | +7.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.12% | 22.27% | +8.85% |
FDIQ vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FDIQ and XMMO have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
FDIQ vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
FDIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 2.56% | 2.66% | 2.69% | 2.89% | 2.51% | 2.04% | 2.92% | 2.44% | 2.45% | 1.59% | 1.50% | 1.92% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIQ and XMMO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to FDIQ (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIQ dropped -52.86% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.73% vs 7.60% for FDIQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, FDIQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIQ and XMMO have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
FDIQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.
FDIQ is categorized as Financials Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. FDIQ tracks Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIQ and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer