FDIF vs. VV
FDIF (Fidelity Disruptors ETF) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FDIF is actively managed, while VV is passively managed. Over the past year, FDIF returned 22.85% vs 27.77% for VV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDIF charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VV.
Performance
FDIF vs. VV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIF achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 10.69% return.
FDIF
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 5.86%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VV
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
FDIF vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIF Fidelity Disruptors ETF | 10.12% | 13.83% | 19.74% | 6.49% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 10.69% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 9.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIF and VV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FDIF and VV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDIF vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDIF
VV
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FDIF
VV
Healthcare
FDIF
VV
Communication Services
FDIF
VV
Industrials
FDIF
VV
Financial Services
FDIF
VV
Consumer Cyclical
FDIF
VV
Real Estate
FDIF
VV
Basic Materials
FDIF
-
VV
Consumer Defensive
FDIF
-
VV
Energy
FDIF
-
VV
Utilities
FDIF
-
VV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIF vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank
FDIF
VV
FDIF vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIF | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.42 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 3.03 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 13.86 | -8.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIF | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 2.33 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.59 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
FDIF vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIF drawdown since its inception was -22.63%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIF and VV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIF | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.63% | -54.81% | +32.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.80% | -9.21% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.72% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -6.84% | +3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 2.01% | +1.90% |
Volatility
FDIF vs. VV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 2.84%. This indicates that FDIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIF | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 2.84% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | 8.98% | +4.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 11.99% | +5.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 17.22% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 18.19% | +0.40% |
FDIF vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIF vs. VV - Dividend Comparison
FDIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than VV's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIF Fidelity Disruptors ETF | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.35% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIF and VV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDIF has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to VV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIF dropped -22.63% vs VV's -54.81%.
On 1-year performance, VV leads with 27.77% vs 22.85% for FDIF. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VV has performed better with a 27.77% return vs 22.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDIF.
VV has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.30% for FDIF.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDIF and 0.04% for VV.
VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIF and VV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer