FDIF vs. FDCF

In the year-to-date period, FDIF achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than FDCF's 2.96% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Both FDIF and FDCF have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) and Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FDIF Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the FDCF Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIF and FDCF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FDIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than FDCF's 0.07% yield.

The maximum FDIF drawdown since its inception was -22.63%, roughly equal to the maximum FDCF drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIF and FDCF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) is 6.86%, while Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that FDIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.