FDIF vs. MOAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT).
FDIF and MOAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDIF is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 16, 2020. MOAT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2012.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FDIF or MOAT.
Key characteristics
| FDIF | MOAT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 21.55% | 14.76% |
| 1Y Return | 38.92% | 32.43% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.45 | 2.66 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.27 | 3.67 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.43 | 1.48 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.63 | 2.92 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.97 | 14.19 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.82% | 2.25% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.04% | 11.99% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.33% | -33.31% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.47% | -0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIF and MOAT is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FDIF vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FDIF achieves a 21.55% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's 14.76% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDIF vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FDIF vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FDIF vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
FDIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than MOAT's 0.75% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIF Fidelity Disruptors ETF | 0.21% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 0.75% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.45% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% | 1.34% | 0.79% |
Drawdowns
FDIF vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIF drawdown since its inception was -17.33%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIF and MOAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FDIF vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 2.64%. This indicates that FDIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.