FDG vs. PID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Global Equities funds. FDG is actively managed, while PID is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDG returned 9.81%/yr vs 8.28%/yr for PID. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.

Performance

FDG vs. PID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly lower than PID's 3.12% return.

FDG

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -6.19%
• YTD: 2.10%
• 6M: 0.17%
• 1Y: 23.89%
• 3Y*: 26.18%
• 5Y*: 9.81%
• 10Y*: —

PID

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -2.75%
• YTD: 3.12%
• 6M: 3.17%
• 1Y: 14.07%
• 3Y*: 12.22%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: 8.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDG vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	2.10%	22.13%	45.89%	37.22%	-35.74%	8.52%	96.27%
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	3.12%	24.45%	3.08%	14.28%	-6.48%	24.49%	44.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FDG and PID is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2020	0.50

The correlation between FDG and PID shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDG vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDG	PID
Technology	37.7%	9.1%
Communication Services	21.5%	13.7%
Consumer Cyclical	17.1%	6.2%
Healthcare	13.2%	8.6%
Industrials	5.2%	7.5%
Financial Services	4.7%	17.5%
Energy	0.6%	12.5%
Utilities	0.1%	15.1%
Basic Materials	-	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.2%
Real Estate	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

FDG vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDG

FDG Risk / Return Rank: 35
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

PID

PID Risk / Return Rank: 42
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 41
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDG vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDG	PID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.44	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	2.13	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.26	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	1.89	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.17	6.22	-1.05

FDG vs. PID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the PID Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDG and PID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDG vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and PID.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDG	PID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.69%	-66.34%	+22.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.71%	-7.47%	-8.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.14%	-13.34%	-12.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.69%	-22.97%	-20.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.01%	-4.35%	-3.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.35%	-13.01%	-0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.63%	2.27%	+2.36%

Volatility

FDG vs. PID - Volatility Comparison

American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.68%. This indicates that FDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDG	PID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.15%	2.68%	+5.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.70%	7.86%	+7.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.12%	9.83%	+9.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.87%	13.96%	+10.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.98%	17.67%	+7.31%

FDG vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDG vs. PID - Dividend Comparison

FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	3.61%	3.28%	3.88%	3.31%	3.30%	3.30%	3.16%	3.99%	3.87%	3.46%	3.90%	4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDG and PID in my portfolio?

FDG and PID have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDG or PID?

FDG has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to PID (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDG dropped -43.69% vs PID's -66.34%.

Which ETF is better, FDG or PID?

On 5-year performance, FDG leads with 9.81% vs 8.28% for PID. On fees, FDG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDG or PID?

Over the 5-year period, FDG has performed better with a 9.81% return vs 8.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDG or PID?

FDG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDG or PID?

PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.

What is the main difference between FDG and PID?

They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDG and 0.56% for PID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.