PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEV vs. FDEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEV vs. FDEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEV achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly lower than FDEM's 24.41% return.


FDEV

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
4.41%
6M
7.53%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*

FDEM

1D
0.90%
1M
8.35%
YTD
24.41%
6M
26.19%
1Y
48.02%
3Y*
24.40%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEV vs. FDEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDEV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
4.41%30.36%5.84%13.37%-16.54%11.00%5.49%10.06%
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
24.41%26.75%9.34%17.26%-13.11%-3.52%8.87%5.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEV and FDEM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.65

The correlation between FDEV and FDEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDEV vs. FDEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDEV
FDEM

Financial Services

21.9%
16.3%

Industrials

15.9%
4.8%

Healthcare

13.3%

-

Energy

10.8%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
7.6%

Utilities

8.1%

-

Communication Services

7.2%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
12.2%

Basic Materials

4.1%
3.2%

Technology

3.7%
31.8%

Real Estate

-

5.2%

Financial Services

FDEV
21.9%
FDEM
16.3%

Industrials

FDEV
15.9%
FDEM
4.8%

Healthcare

FDEV
13.3%
FDEM

-

Energy

FDEV
10.8%
FDEM
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

FDEV
9.5%
FDEM
7.6%

Utilities

FDEV
8.1%
FDEM

-

Communication Services

FDEV
7.2%
FDEM
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FDEV
4.5%
FDEM
12.2%

Basic Materials

FDEV
4.1%
FDEM
3.2%

Technology

FDEV
3.7%
FDEM
31.8%

Real Estate

FDEV

-

FDEM
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEV vs. FDEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEV
FDEV Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FDEM
FDEM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEV vs. FDEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDEVFDEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

2.79

-1.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

3.64

-1.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.50

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

3.83

-2.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.99

15.05

-8.06

FDEV vs. FDEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the FDEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEV and FDEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDEVFDEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.79

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.61

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.54

-0.01

Drawdowns

FDEV vs. FDEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEV drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum FDEM drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEV and FDEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEVFDEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-33.65%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-12.70%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.47%

-16.04%

+5.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-29.02%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.30%

0.00%

-4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-8.84%

+2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

3.23%

-1.02%

Volatility

FDEV vs. FDEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) is 3.72%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that FDEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDEVFDEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

7.13%

-3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

14.95%

-5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.95%

17.29%

-5.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

16.11%

-2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.33%

17.91%

-2.58%

FDEV vs. FDEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FDEM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEV vs. FDEM - Dividend Comparison

FDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than FDEM's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
2.62%3.23%4.05%4.41%3.95%2.71%1.84%2.39%
FDEV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
2.81%2.86%2.99%2.80%2.65%2.81%1.88%2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDEV and FDEM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDEM has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to FDEV (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEV dropped -30.11% vs FDEM's -33.65%.

On 5-year performance, FDEM leads with 9.81% vs 7.33% for FDEV. On fees, FDEV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FDEV has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDEM has performed better with a 9.81% return vs 7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDEV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDEM.

FDEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.62% for FDEM.

FDEV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FDEM is Emerging Markets Equities. FDEV tracks Fidelity Targeted International Factor Index, while FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDEV and 0.45% for FDEM.

FDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEV and FDEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer