FDEV vs. FDEM
FDEV (Fidelity International Multifactor ETF) and FDEM (Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDEV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Targeted International Factor Index, while FDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDEV returned 7.33%/yr vs 9.81%/yr for FDEM. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDEV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDEM.
Performance
FDEV vs. FDEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDEV achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly lower than FDEM's 24.41% return.
FDEV
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 4.41%
- 6M
- 7.53%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- —
FDEM
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- 24.41%
- 6M
- 26.19%
- 1Y
- 48.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- —
FDEV vs. FDEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEV Fidelity International Multifactor ETF | 4.41% | 30.36% | 5.84% | 13.37% | -16.54% | 11.00% | 5.49% | 10.06% |
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 24.41% | 26.75% | 9.34% | 17.26% | -13.11% | -3.52% | 8.87% | 5.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDEV and FDEM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019 | 0.65 |
The correlation between FDEV and FDEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDEV vs. FDEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDEV
FDEM
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FDEV
FDEM
Industrials
FDEV
FDEM
Healthcare
FDEV
FDEM
-
Energy
FDEV
FDEM
Consumer Defensive
FDEV
FDEM
Utilities
FDEV
FDEM
-
Communication Services
FDEV
FDEM
Consumer Cyclical
FDEV
FDEM
Basic Materials
FDEV
FDEM
Technology
FDEV
FDEM
Real Estate
FDEV
-
FDEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDEV vs. FDEM — Risk / Return Rank
FDEV
FDEM
FDEV vs. FDEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDEV | FDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 2.79 | -1.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 3.64 | -1.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.50 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 3.83 | -2.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.99 | 15.05 | -8.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDEV | FDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 2.79 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.61 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.54 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
FDEV vs. FDEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDEV drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum FDEM drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEV and FDEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDEV | FDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.11% | -33.65% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.46% | -12.70% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.47% | -16.04% | +5.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.02% | -29.02% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.30% | 0.00% | -4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -8.84% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 3.23% | -1.02% |
Volatility
FDEV vs. FDEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) is 3.72%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that FDEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDEV | FDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 7.13% | -3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 14.95% | -5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.95% | 17.29% | -5.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 16.11% | -2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 17.91% | -2.58% |
FDEV vs. FDEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDEV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FDEM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDEV vs. FDEM - Dividend Comparison
FDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than FDEM's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 2.62% | 3.23% | 4.05% | 4.41% | 3.95% | 2.71% | 1.84% | 2.39% |
FDEV Fidelity International Multifactor ETF | 2.81% | 2.86% | 2.99% | 2.80% | 2.65% | 2.81% | 1.88% | 2.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDEV and FDEM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDEM has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to FDEV (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEV dropped -30.11% vs FDEM's -33.65%.
On 5-year performance, FDEM leads with 9.81% vs 7.33% for FDEV. On fees, FDEV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FDEV has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDEM has performed better with a 9.81% return vs 7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDEV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDEM.
FDEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.62% for FDEM.
FDEV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FDEM is Emerging Markets Equities. FDEV tracks Fidelity Targeted International Factor Index, while FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDEV and 0.45% for FDEM.
FDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDEV and FDEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer