FDETX vs. NLR
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR).
FDETX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 30, 1985. NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007.
Performance
FDETX vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDETX vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDETX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O | -5.03% | 27.60% | 27.07% | 24.20% | -8.00% | 25.32% | 9.12% | 31.39% | -9.09% | 16.45% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 7.24% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDETX achieves a -5.03% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's 7.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FDETX has outperformed NLR with an annualized return of 14.66%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively lower 13.86% annualized return.
FDETX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -5.03%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 24.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 14.66%
NLR
- 1D
- 4.76%
- 1M
- -10.17%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 86.31%
- 3Y*
- 37.32%
- 5Y*
- 23.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDETX vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDETX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDETX vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
FDETX
NLR
FDETX vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDETX | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 2.06 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 2.63 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.33 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 3.26 | -1.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | 7.88 | +0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDETX | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 2.06 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.59 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.18 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDETX and NLR is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FDETX vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
FDETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.89%, more than NLR's 2.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDETX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O | 10.89% | 10.34% | 8.95% | 4.39% | 5.66% | 5.63% | 4.47% | 7.46% | 15.81% | 5.34% | 2.92% | 5.97% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 2.38% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Drawdowns
FDETX vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDETX drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, roughly equal to the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDETX and NLR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDETX | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | -65.05% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.42% | -25.80% | +13.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.72% | -30.48% | +8.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.61% | -34.35% | -2.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.64% | -18.97% | +9.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -35.91% | +24.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 10.67% | -7.97% |
Volatility
FDETX vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX) is 4.48%, while VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 14.04%. This indicates that FDETX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDETX | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 14.04% | -9.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 32.94% | -23.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.39% | 42.23% | -23.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 28.16% | -10.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 23.39% | -4.57% |