PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDETX vs. VOOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDETX vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDETX achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly higher than VOOV's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FDETX has outperformed VOOV with an annualized return of 15.67%, while VOOV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.86% annualized return.


FDETX

1D
1.83%
1M
-0.03%
6M
7.37%
YTD
10.79%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
23.22%
5Y*
16.56%
10Y*
15.67%
ALL TIME*
15.32%

VOOV

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.60%
6M
7.41%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
11.86%
ALL TIME*
12.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$15.60M$14.29M$15.18M

FDETX vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDETX
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O
10.79%27.60%27.07%24.20%-8.00%25.32%9.12%31.39%-9.09%16.45%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
10.13%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FDETX and VOOV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.90

The correlation between FDETX and VOOV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.90 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDETX vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDETX
FDETX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDETX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FDETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDETX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDETX vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDETXVOOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.35

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

3.13

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.93

12.04

-2.11

FDETX vs. VOOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDETX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the VOOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDETX and VOOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDETX vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDETX drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than VOOV's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDETX and VOOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDETXVOOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.86%

-37.31%

-29.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-6.27%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.76%

-17.55%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

-18.10%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.61%

-37.31%

+0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-1.13%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-3.81%

-7.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

1.63%

+0.54%

Volatility

FDETX vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) at 2.65%. This indicates that FDETX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDETXVOOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

2.65%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

7.14%

+3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

9.98%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

14.36%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

16.88%

+1.87%

FDETX vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDETX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDETX vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison

FDETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.33%, more than VOOV's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDETX
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O
9.33%10.34%8.95%4.39%5.66%5.63%4.47%7.46%15.81%5.34%2.92%5.97%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.67%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDETX and VOOV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDETX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to VOOV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDETX dropped -66.86% vs VOOV's -37.31%.

VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDETX and VOOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer