FDEM vs. FLRG

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FDEM (Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF) and FLRG (Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while FLRG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDEM returned 9.14%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for FLRG. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDEM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FLRG.

Performance

FDEM vs. FLRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly higher than FLRG's 7.49% return.

FDEM

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 20.05%
• 6M: 22.29%
• 1Y: 38.42%
• 3Y*: 21.94%
• 5Y*: 9.14%
• 10Y*: —

FLRG

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: 7.49%
• 6M: 6.89%
• 1Y: 17.66%
• 3Y*: 18.22%
• 5Y*: 12.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEM vs. FLRG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF	20.05%	26.75%	9.34%	17.26%	-13.11%	-3.52%	15.71%
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF	7.49%	13.92%	23.36%	18.31%	-10.98%	29.36%	9.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEM and FLRG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020	0.56

The correlation between FDEM and FLRG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDEM vs. FLRG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDEM	FLRG
Technology	38.5%	38.8%
Financial Services	15.0%	11.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	9.5%
Communication Services	9.6%	9.9%
Energy	7.3%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	4.5%
Real Estate	4.6%	2.0%
Industrials	4.4%	7.3%
Basic Materials	2.7%	2.3%
Healthcare	-	9.1%
Utilities	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

FDEM vs. FLRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEM

FDEM Risk / Return Rank: 67
FDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FLRG

FLRG Risk / Return Rank: 54
FLRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FLRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FLRG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FLRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FLRG Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEM vs. FLRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDEM	FLRG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	1.58	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	2.24	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.28	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	2.31	+0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.85	8.93	+1.92

FDEM vs. FLRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the FLRG Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEM and FLRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDEM vs. FLRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, which is greater than FLRG's maximum drawdown of -19.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and FLRG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDEM	FLRG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.65%	-19.64%	-14.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.70%	-7.16%	-5.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.04%	-16.53%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.47%	-19.64%	-8.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.51%	-1.87%	-1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.82%	-3.73%	-5.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	1.86%	+1.51%

Volatility

FDEM vs. FLRG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) at 3.57%. This indicates that FDEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDEM	FLRG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.65%	3.57%	+6.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.93%	8.13%	+8.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.94%	10.49%	+8.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.48%	15.22%	+1.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.10%	15.03%	+3.07%

FDEM vs. FLRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRG's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDEM vs. FLRG - Dividend Comparison

FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than FLRG's 1.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF	2.72%	3.23%	4.05%	4.41%	3.95%	2.71%	1.84%	2.39%
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF	1.36%	1.42%	1.42%	1.39%	1.62%	1.36%	1.47%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDEM and FLRG in my portfolio?

FDEM and FLRG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDEM or FLRG?

FDEM has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to FLRG (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEM dropped -33.65% vs FLRG's -19.64%.

Which ETF is better, FDEM or FLRG?

On 5-year performance, FLRG leads with 12.45% vs 9.14% for FDEM. On fees, FLRG is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FLRG has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDEM or FLRG?

Over the 5-year period, FLRG has performed better with a 12.45% return vs 9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDEM or FLRG?

FLRG is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDEM or FLRG?

FDEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.36% for FLRG.

What is the main difference between FDEM and FLRG?

FDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FLRG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while FLRG tracks Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDEM and 0.29% for FLRG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.