PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEM vs. FDEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEM vs. FDEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 22.58% return, which is significantly higher than FDEV's 3.89% return.


FDEM

1D
-1.46%
1M
7.69%
YTD
22.58%
6M
24.26%
1Y
45.52%
3Y*
23.79%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

FDEV

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
3.89%
6M
6.83%
1Y
15.07%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEM vs. FDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
22.58%26.75%9.34%17.26%-13.11%-3.52%8.87%5.73%
FDEV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
3.89%30.36%5.84%13.37%-16.54%11.00%5.49%10.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEM and FDEV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.65

The correlation between FDEM and FDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDEM vs. FDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDEM
FDEV

Technology

31.8%
3.7%

Financial Services

16.3%
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
4.5%

Communication Services

10.6%
7.2%

Energy

8.3%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
9.5%

Real Estate

5.2%

-

Industrials

4.8%
15.9%

Basic Materials

3.2%
4.1%

Healthcare

-

13.3%

Utilities

-

8.1%

Technology

FDEM
31.8%
FDEV
3.7%

Financial Services

FDEM
16.3%
FDEV
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FDEM
12.2%
FDEV
4.5%

Communication Services

FDEM
10.6%
FDEV
7.2%

Energy

FDEM
8.3%
FDEV
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

FDEM
7.6%
FDEV
9.5%

Real Estate

FDEM
5.2%
FDEV

-

Industrials

FDEM
4.8%
FDEV
15.9%

Basic Materials

FDEM
3.2%
FDEV
4.1%

Healthcare

FDEM

-

FDEV
13.3%

Utilities

FDEM

-

FDEV
8.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEM vs. FDEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEM
FDEM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FDEV
FDEV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEM vs. FDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDEMFDEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.23

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

1.79

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.12

6.78

+7.34

FDEM vs. FDEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the FDEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEM and FDEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDEMFDEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

1.28

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.51

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.52

0.00

Drawdowns

FDEM vs. FDEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, which is greater than FDEV's maximum drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and FDEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEMFDEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.65%

-30.11%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-8.46%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

-10.47%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-29.02%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-4.78%

+3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-6.29%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

2.23%

+1.00%

Volatility

FDEM vs. FDEV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) at 3.61%. This indicates that FDEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDEMFDEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

3.61%

+3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

9.68%

+5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.36%

11.90%

+5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

13.90%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

15.33%

+2.58%

FDEM vs. FDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FDEV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEM vs. FDEV - Dividend Comparison

FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than FDEV's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
2.66%3.23%4.05%4.41%3.95%2.71%1.84%2.39%
FDEV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
2.83%2.86%2.99%2.80%2.65%2.81%1.88%2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDEM and FDEV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDEM has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to FDEV (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEM dropped -33.65% vs FDEV's -30.11%.

On 5-year performance, FDEM leads with 9.43% vs 7.01% for FDEV. On fees, FDEV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FDEV has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDEM has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDEV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDEM.

FDEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.66% for FDEM.

FDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FDEV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while FDEV tracks Fidelity Targeted International Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDEM and 0.39% for FDEV.

FDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEM and FDEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer