PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDD vs. NORW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDD vs. NORW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDD achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 26.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDD having a 9.96% annualized return and NORW not far behind at 9.61%.


FDD

1D
-1.17%
1M
3.51%
YTD
11.53%
6M
17.78%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
9.96%

NORW

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
26.31%
6M
31.64%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
23.02%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDD vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
11.53%62.50%0.28%14.16%-16.14%16.03%-3.80%23.79%-8.98%19.07%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
26.31%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FDD and NORW is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2009

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between FDD and NORW has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDD vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDD
NORW

Financial Services

52.2%
22.6%

Industrials

12.5%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
0.2%

Energy

10.8%
29.4%

Utilities

6.0%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
12.5%

Real Estate

3.5%
0.4%

Basic Materials

2.9%
10.9%

Communication Services

2.1%
5.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

4.1%

Financial Services

FDD
52.2%
NORW
22.6%

Industrials

FDD
12.5%
NORW
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FDD
12.3%
NORW
0.2%

Energy

FDD
10.8%
NORW
29.4%

Utilities

FDD
6.0%
NORW
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

FDD
3.7%
NORW
12.5%

Real Estate

FDD
3.5%
NORW
0.4%

Basic Materials

FDD
2.9%
NORW
10.9%

Communication Services

FDD
2.1%
NORW
5.9%

Healthcare

FDD

-

NORW

-

Technology

FDD

-

NORW
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDD vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDD
FDD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDD vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDDNORWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

3.95

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

11.27

+0.60

FDD vs. NORW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDD Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the NORW Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDD and NORW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDDNORWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.18

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.37

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.46

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.40

-0.31

Drawdowns

FDD vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDD drawdown since its inception was -74.77%, which is greater than NORW's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDD and NORW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDDNORWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.77%

-35.62%

-39.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-9.18%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.06%

-16.06%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.11%

-32.78%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.43%

-33.86%

-7.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-3.53%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.47%

-10.13%

-25.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

3.21%

-0.42%

Volatility

FDD vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison

First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) at 4.06%. This indicates that FDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDDNORWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

4.06%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

12.73%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

16.70%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

21.88%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.16%

20.80%

-0.64%

FDD vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDD has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than NORW's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDD vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison

FDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than NORW's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
3.55%3.99%7.65%6.85%6.07%3.44%4.01%4.69%5.05%2.78%4.88%4.35%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
2.72%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDD and NORW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDD has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to NORW (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDD dropped -74.77% vs NORW's -35.62%.

On 10-year performance, FDD leads with 9.96% vs 9.61% for NORW. On fees, NORW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDD has performed better with a 9.96% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NORW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.

FDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 2.72% for NORW.

FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FDD and 0.50% for NORW.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDD and NORW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer