PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDCF vs. XTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDCF vs. XTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDCF vs. XTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
-9.91%27.42%28.37%16.39%
XTL
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF
24.90%44.95%34.89%6.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDCF achieves a -9.91% return, which is significantly lower than XTL's 24.90% return.


FDCF

1D
0.62%
1M
-5.81%
YTD
-9.91%
6M
-12.31%
1Y
16.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTL

1D
1.40%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
24.90%
6M
34.72%
1Y
93.29%
3Y*
34.33%
5Y*
16.17%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDCF vs. XTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XTL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FDCF vs. XTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDCF
FDCF Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FDCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDCF Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FDCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDCF Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

XTL
XTL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDCF vs. XTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDCFXTLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

3.05

-2.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.13

3.53

-2.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.48

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

6.35

-5.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.02

23.14

-20.12

FDCF vs. XTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDCF Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the XTL Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDCF and XTL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDCFXTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

3.05

-2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.47

+0.56

Correlation

The correlation between FDCF and XTL is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FDCF vs. XTL - Dividend Comparison

FDCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than XTL's 1.04% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
0.04%0.09%0.25%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XTL
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF
1.04%1.05%0.62%0.80%0.74%1.25%0.88%0.92%1.90%2.08%1.11%1.38%

Drawdowns

FDCF vs. XTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDCF drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum XTL drawdown of -37.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCF and XTL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDCFXTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.53%

-37.01%

+14.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.10%

-14.70%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.97%

-3.38%

-10.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-9.86%

+5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.87%

4.03%

+1.84%

Volatility

FDCF vs. XTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) is 8.06%, while SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) has a volatility of 11.88%. This indicates that FDCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDCFXTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.06%

11.88%

-3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

23.49%

-9.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.02%

30.73%

-7.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

24.68%

-3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

23.25%

-2.50%