PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDCF vs. FBCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDCF vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDCF vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
-9.91%27.42%28.37%16.39%
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
-7.08%18.60%39.05%15.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDCF achieves a -9.91% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's -7.08% return.


FDCF

1D
0.62%
1M
-5.81%
YTD
-9.91%
6M
-12.31%
1Y
16.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBCG

1D
1.68%
1M
-3.96%
YTD
-7.08%
6M
-5.08%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
26.11%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDCF vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FDCF vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDCF
FDCF Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FDCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDCF Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FDCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDCF Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FBCG
FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDCF vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDCFFBCGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

1.00

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.13

1.57

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.22

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

1.82

-0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.02

6.44

-3.42

FDCF vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDCF Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDCF and FBCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDCFFBCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

1.00

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.68

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between FDCF and FBCG is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FDCF vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

FDCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than FBCG's 0.05% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
0.04%0.09%0.25%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
0.05%0.05%0.12%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

FDCF vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDCF drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCF and FBCG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDCFFBCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.53%

-43.56%

+21.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.10%

-15.17%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.97%

-9.60%

-4.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-11.78%

+7.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.87%

4.28%

+1.59%

Volatility

FDCF vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) have volatilities of 8.06% and 8.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDCFFBCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.06%

8.39%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

14.84%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.02%

26.33%

-3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

25.82%

-5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

25.92%

-5.17%