FDAT vs. MDAA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FDAT (Tactical Advantage ETF) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDAT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.

Performance

FDAT vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDAT achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 15.59% return.

FDAT

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 3.43%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 11.23%
• 3Y*: 8.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MDAA

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 6M: 14.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDAT vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF	3.43%	-0.90%
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	15.59%	-0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FDAT and MDAA is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025	0.79

Return for Risk

FDAT vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDAT

FDAT Risk / Return Rank: 35
FDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

MDAA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDAT vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDAT	MDAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.23	—	—

Drawdowns

FDAT vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDAT drawdown since its inception was -8.20%, smaller than the maximum MDAA drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAT and MDAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDAT	MDAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	-14.59%	+6.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.05%	-6.40%	+4.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.25%	-3.06%	+0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDAT	MDAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.83%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.52%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.46%	25.19%	-14.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.60%	25.19%	-15.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.60%	25.19%	-15.59%

FDAT vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDAT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDAT vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison

FDAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, more than MDAA's 0.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF	5.94%	4.77%	8.99%	1.58%
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	0.40%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDAT and MDAA in my portfolio?

FDAT and MDAA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDAT or MDAA?

On fees, FDAT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDAT or MDAA?

FDAT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MDAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDAT or MDAA?

FDAT has the higher dividend yield at 5.94%, compared with 0.40% for MDAA.

What is the main difference between FDAT and MDAA?

They also come from different issuers: Tactical Funds and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FDAT and 0.97% for MDAA.