FDAT vs. HISF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDAT (Tactical Advantage ETF) and HISF (First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FDAT returned 11.57% vs 5.74% for HISF. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDAT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for HISF.

Performance

FDAT vs. HISF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDAT achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly higher than HISF's 0.03% return.

FDAT

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 6M: 3.66%
• 1Y: 11.57%
• 3Y*: 9.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HISF

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.03%
• 6M: 0.23%
• 1Y: 5.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDAT vs. HISF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF	3.20%	7.50%	8.16%
HISF First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF	0.03%	8.39%	3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FDAT and HISF is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024	0.38

Return for Risk

FDAT vs. HISF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDAT

FDAT Risk / Return Rank: 35
FDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

HISF

HISF Risk / Return Rank: 48
HISF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
HISF Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
HISF Omega Ratio Rank: 52
HISF Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
HISF Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDAT vs. HISF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDAT	HISF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.74	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	2.55	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.32	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	1.99	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.59	7.21	-1.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDAT vs. HISF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the HISF Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDAT and HISF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDAT	HISF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	1.74	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	1.31	-0.39

Drawdowns

FDAT vs. HISF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDAT drawdown since its inception was -8.20%, which is greater than HISF's maximum drawdown of -3.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAT and HISF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDAT	HISF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	-3.86%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.88%	-2.90%	-2.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.27%	-1.20%	-1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.25%	-0.89%	-1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	0.80%	+1.27%

Volatility

FDAT vs. HISF - Volatility Comparison

Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF) at 1.21%. This indicates that FDAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HISF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDAT	HISF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	1.21%	+2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.91%	2.61%	+4.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.89%	3.32%	+6.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.47%	3.95%	+5.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.47%	3.95%	+5.52%

FDAT vs. HISF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDAT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than HISF's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDAT vs. HISF - Dividend Comparison

FDAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than HISF's 5.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF	5.64%	4.77%	8.99%	1.58%
HISF First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF	5.00%	4.69%	3.92%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDAT and HISF in my portfolio?

FDAT and HISF have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDAT or HISF?

FDAT has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to HISF (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDAT dropped -8.20% vs HISF's -3.86%.

Which ETF is better, FDAT or HISF?

On 1-year performance, FDAT leads with 11.57% vs 5.74% for HISF. On fees, FDAT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, HISF has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDAT or HISF?

Over the 1-year period, FDAT has performed better with a 11.57% return vs 5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDAT or HISF?

FDAT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for HISF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDAT or HISF?

FDAT has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 5.00% for HISF.

What is the main difference between FDAT and HISF?

They also come from different issuers: Tactical Funds and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FDAT and 0.87% for HISF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HISF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.