FCXG vs. CIFU

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

FCXG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FCXG is passively managed, while CIFU is actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCXG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIFU.

Performance

FCXG vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FCXG

• 1D: 3.28%
• 1M: -16.29%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFU

• 1D: -9.74%
• 1M: -12.14%
• 6M: -3.54%
• YTD: 17.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCXG vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FCXG Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF	-16.00%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	32.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FCXG and CIFU is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.57

Return for Risk

FCXG vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

FCXG vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCXG drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum CIFU drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCXG and CIFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCXG	CIFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.55%	-77.20%	+32.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.38%	-45.90%	+13.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.99%	-42.51%	+20.52%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FCXG	CIFU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	109.14%	206.12%	-96.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	109.14%	206.12%	-96.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	109.14%	206.12%	-96.98%

FCXG vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCXG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCXG vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

Neither FCXG nor CIFU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCXG and CIFU in my portfolio?

FCXG and CIFU have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCXG or CIFU?

On fees, FCXG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCXG or CIFU?

FCXG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCXG or CIFU?

FCXG and CIFU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FCXG and CIFU?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FCXG and 1.50% for CIFU.