PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCXG vs. GLWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCXG vs. GLWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FCXG

1D
-2.86%
1M
55.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLWG

1D
0.42%
1M
46.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCXG vs. GLWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FCXG and GLWG is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCXG vs. GLWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FCXG vs. GLWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCXGGLWGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

8.78

-8.29

Drawdowns

FCXG vs. GLWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCXG drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than GLWG's maximum drawdown of -29.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCXG and GLWG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCXGGLWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-29.53%

-15.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.40%

-10.32%

+3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.29%

-10.71%

-10.58%

Volatility

FCXG vs. GLWG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCXGGLWGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.72%

151.06%

-41.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.72%

151.06%

-41.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.72%

151.06%

-41.34%

FCXG vs. GLWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FCXG and GLWG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

FCXG vs. GLWG - Dividend Comparison

Neither FCXG nor GLWG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FCXG and GLWG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCXG and GLWG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

FCXG and GLWG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

FCXG tracks Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX), while GLWG tracks Corning Incorporated (GLW).

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCXG and GLWG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer