FCUS vs. TIPB
FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) and TIPB (Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCUS is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Pinnacle, while TIPB is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Northern Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
FCUS vs. TIPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCUS achieves a 50.06% return, which is significantly higher than TIPB's 1.86% return.
FCUS
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 10.76%
- YTD
- 50.06%
- 6M
- 52.19%
- 1Y
- 96.08%
- 3Y*
- 37.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TIPB
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCUS vs. TIPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 50.06% | 24.05% |
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.86% | 0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCUS and TIPB is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCUS vs. TIPB — Risk / Return Rank
FCUS
TIPB
FCUS vs. TIPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCUS | TIPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.54 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCUS | TIPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
FCUS vs. TIPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, which is greater than TIPB's maximum drawdown of -1.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and TIPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCUS | TIPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.89% | -1.32% | -38.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.31% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -0.37% | -7.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | — | — |
Volatility
FCUS vs. TIPB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCUS | TIPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.92% | 2.54% | +31.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 2.54% | +27.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 2.54% | +27.44% |
Dividends
FCUS vs. TIPB - Dividend Comparison
FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than TIPB's 3.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 2.89% | 4.33% | 11.19% |
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 3.02% | 1.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCUS and TIPB have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIPB has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 2.89% for FCUS.
FCUS is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while TIPB is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Pinnacle and Northern Trust.
Find the right allocation for FCUS and TIPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer