FCUS vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCUS is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Pinnacle, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. FCUS is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, FCUS returned 96.08% vs 4.57% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. FCUS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

FCUS vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUS achieves a 50.06% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.70% return.

FCUS

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 10.76%
• YTD: 50.06%
• 6M: 52.19%
• 1Y: 96.08%
• 3Y*: 37.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUS vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	50.06%	17.08%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.70%	2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FCUS and RBIL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	-0.16

Return for Risk

FCUS vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUS

FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 81
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUS vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCUS	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	5.01	-2.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	7.92	-4.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	2.39	-0.95
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.46	17.00	-11.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.54	70.66	-51.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCUS vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUS and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCUS	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	5.01	-2.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	4.28	-3.15

Drawdowns

FCUS vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCUS	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.89%	-0.50%	-39.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-0.27%	-17.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.55%	-0.06%	-7.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	0.07%	+4.86%

Volatility

FCUS vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) has a higher volatility of 10.14% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that FCUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCUS	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.14%	0.30%	+9.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.37%	0.79%	+24.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.92%	0.92%	+33.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.98%	1.05%	+28.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.98%	1.05%	+28.93%

FCUS vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCUS vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	2.89%	4.33%	11.19%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCUS and RBIL in my portfolio?

FCUS and RBIL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCUS or RBIL?

FCUS has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCUS dropped -39.89% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

Which ETF is better, FCUS or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, FCUS leads with 96.08% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FCUS or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, FCUS has performed better with a 96.08% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCUS or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCUS or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 2.89% for FCUS.

What is the main difference between FCUS and RBIL?

FCUS is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Pinnacle and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FCUS and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 2.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.