FCUS vs. BBHM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) and BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. FCUS is actively managed, while BBHM is passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCUS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for BBHM.

Performance

FCUS vs. BBHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUS achieves a 50.06% return, which is significantly higher than BBHM's 1.78% return.

FCUS

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 10.76%
• YTD: 50.06%
• 6M: 52.19%
• 1Y: 96.08%
• 3Y*: 37.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBHM

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: -0.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUS vs. BBHM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	50.06%	4.79%
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	1.78%	2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FCUS and BBHM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

FCUS vs. BBHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUS

FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 81
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUS vs. BBHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCUS	BBHM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.46	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.54	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCUS	BBHM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	0.50	+0.63

Drawdowns

FCUS vs. BBHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, which is greater than BBHM's maximum drawdown of -9.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and BBHM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCUS	BBHM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.89%	-9.78%	-30.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.28%	+5.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.55%	-2.71%	-4.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FCUS	BBHM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.92%	17.46%	+16.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.98%	17.46%	+12.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.98%	17.46%	+12.52%

FCUS vs. BBHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BBHM's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCUS vs. BBHM - Dividend Comparison

FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, while BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	2.89%	4.33%	11.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCUS and BBHM in my portfolio?

FCUS and BBHM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCUS or BBHM?

On fees, FCUS is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCUS or BBHM?

FCUS is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCUS or BBHM?

FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.

What is the main difference between FCUS and BBHM?

They also come from different issuers: Pinnacle and BBH. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FCUS and 0.81% for BBHM.